What Others Are Saying About: “Pull It”

adam-zyglis-obama-nobel
Facing the TRUTH: Government Liars and Crimes Are State Secrets.


It’s September of 2014, the world is caught up in a whirlwind of terroranoia while global leaders posture and position themselves in preparation for the final stages in the agenda for a New World Order…with the 13th anniversary of 911 coming up right around the corner it is imperative now more than ever that we expose this event for what it was…a false flag operation designed to advance the agenda of the global elite


Remember the 13th anniversary of the tragic attacks on 9/11. The fallout was huge.
Of course the immediate impact claimed the lives of nearly 3 thousand Americans. But the lasting effects are still echoing through the country today.
The Patriot Act.
The abuse of power by the NSA.
Pat downs and metal detectors at the airports.
The tragedy was so huge, politicians STILL refer to this new era as a “Post-9/11 World.”
American freedoms, laws and even military actions all seem to hinge on that one fateful day, more than a decade ago.


Infowars Reporter Lee Ann McAdoo: How for the first time, the Sept. 11 foundation is in charge of New York City’s annual 9/11 anniversary ceremony. Former Mayor Michael Bloomberg and his top aides had been in charge of every aspect of the ceremony planning since the terrorist attacks.
[Another money interest FOUNDATION in control is yet another example…]

The War On Terror 13 Years On: Mission Accomplished?

As the anniversary to the September 11th attacks approaches, Dr Adnan Siddiqui asks whether or not the British government’s stance on returnees from Syria represents an evolution in thinking from the knee-jerk reaction we saw on that day in America 13 years ago.

One can’t help feeling a sense of déjà vu as David Cameron prepares the UK for air strikes against IS­­­and tells the public that we should be prepared for a “generational” conflict. Last year he was saying the same thingabout the war against Al-Qaeda, yet now he is talking about an adversary that even Al-Qaeda has disavowed.

As we approach the anniversary of 9/11 and 13 years of the War on Terror one must ask what progress have we made? Are we any safer with the terror threat level being raised last week? Are Afghanistan and Iraq bastions of democracy?
Read More: Written By: Dr Adnan Siddiqui

As we pause on this 9/11 to remind ourselves of the horrible killing of innocents committed by a gang of extremists 13 years ago, we should reserve some anger for policymakers and law enforcement officers who discredit the cause of justice by ignoring or even protecting other terrorists in our midst depending on their politics. These more obscure bombers and assassins may have called themselves freedom fighters, but their crimes were as evil — and deserve the same punishment — as the mass murders of Sept. 11, 2001. –consortiumnews.com

[Emphasis added for our discussions. ~Ron]

This 13th Anniversary of the world’s biggest terrorist attacks is also a day to take stock and look at the added impact the events of that day had on our all lives. Now we suffer an almost permanent invasive spying by governments on innocent citizens, monitoring of email and messaging traffic and listening into phone calls, as we now apparently are deemed guilty until proven innocent. That not enough have governments intensified spying on other governments, even those deemed allies and ‘friendly’ by an NSA and other even murkier organizations which make Orwell’s science fiction book 1984 look like a bed time story for kids – but then it is a fine line between sheer paranoia and dutiful precautions. Yet, with all these changes to our liberties, done in the name of protecting us even if our liberties are progressively eroded, we are hardly safer today as a never ending cycle of terror prompts ever newer and more invasive and intrusive counter measures… –wolfganghthome.wordpress.com


Personal Experience:

  • What is being said in your community?
  • Has your local police been militarized?
  • Tired of being molested at airports by the TSA?
  • Concerned about rising bills with additional fees for DHS, TSA, and other new security policies mandated by government?

.
RELATED:

https://ronmamita.wordpress.com/2014/01/17/countless-people-are-making-efforts-to-share-awareness-of-the-martial-law-world-war-toxic-path-institutions-are-on/
https://ronmamita.wordpress.com/2013/10/09/reminder-martial-law-still-in-effect/
https://ronmamita.wordpress.com/2014/08/06/is-a-big-event-imminent/
https://ronmamita.wordpress.com/2014/02/24/warring-factions-within-usg/
https://ronmamita.wordpress.com/2014/02/07/slave-legacy-government-issue-orders-and-obedience-training/
https://ronmamita.wordpress.com/2013/12/31/many-patriotic-people-falsely-believe-it-cant-happen-here/
https://ronmamita.wordpress.com/2013/12/08/permanent-boycotts-not-for-a-week-not-for-a-month-for-however-long-it-takes/
https://ronmamita.wordpress.com/2014/08/17/global-efforts-starving-the-beast/
_______________________________________________________

About

Want Worldwide PEACE and Prosperity. We are the solution we have been searching for... Free People of Earth will solve our crisis and create an era of Creativity. Be at Peace; Be Aware; Be Creative; Be Active; Be Free and Alive; and then Share it. LOVE & Peace AMOR y Paz

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Freedom-Expressed
7 comments on “What Others Are Saying About: “Pull It”
  1. RonMamita says:

    9/11: AMERICA’S REICHSTAG — Why The Truth Is More Important Than Ever

    Posted 10 Sept 2014
    The 9/11 False Flag: America’s Reichtag. Chris Duane and Jeff Nielson join me to discuss the truth about the day the changed everything and why exposing this false flag for what it is, is more important than ever.

    Chris’s website: http://silvershieldcollection.com/silvershieldxchange-com/

    Jeff’s site: http://www.bullionbullscanada.com/

    For REAL News & Information 24/7:
    http://sgtreport.com/
    http://thelibertymill.com/

  2. RonMamita says:

    Declassified: Massive Israeli manipulation of US media exposed

    Posted 19 Aug 2010
    Files declassified in America have revealed covert public relations and lobbying activities of Israel in the U.S. The National Archive made the documents public following a Senate investigation. They suggest Israel has been trying to shape media coverage of issues it regards as important. You can download the files from the web-site of the Institute for Research on Middle Eastern policy. And we can cross to Washington now and talk to Grant F. Smith who is a director at that Institute.

  3. RonMamita says:

    Interview 940 – RE2 Podcast: The 9/11 Attacks

    via RE2 Podcast:

    James joins Michael and Steven of the RE2 podcast to discuss the 13th anniversary of the 9/11 events. This wide-ranging conversation covers the events of that day, the motivations for the attacks, and the ongoing pursuit of 9/11 truth and justice.

     

  4. RonMamita says:

    Interview 938 – Our Troubled Times: The West’s Engineered Downfall

    via The Our Troubled Times Podcast:

    In this episode we speak with James Corbett of CorbettReport.com about how the West is creating and funding its own enemies abroad. We discussed in this program how Russia has been backed into a position where it must unite with its neighbors politically, with others in the BRICS nations economically, and China militarily in an effort to counteract NATO/US/EU encroachment into Russia’s sphere of influence. We also speak about how western intelligence agencies have created, funded, and propagandized on behalf of ISIS, again, creating another external threat. Finally we comment on the protests in Ferguson and how the media and police are exacerbating the problem. Join us as we discuss the major issues of the world today.

    Show Notes:

    How the West is Engineering Its Own Downfall

    Who Is ISIS? An Open Source Investigation– James Corbett

    James and JoAnne Moriarty Interviews 849 and 898 on CorbettReport.com

    Sponsored by West ISIS Will Become a Nightmare For The Western World– RT

    Foley Murder Video ‘May Have Been Staged’– The Telegraph

    Former Al-Qaeda Commander: ISIS Works for the CIA– Infowars

    NSA Doc Reveals ISIS Leader Al- Baghdadi Is US, British, Israeli Intelligence Asset– Infowars

    ISIS Reveals Global Takeover Map– Infowars

    The Truth About Spetember 11th Part 1– Lenon Honor

    DOD 1033 Program Requires Police To Use Their Military Gear Within One Year or Return It– The Free Though Project

    Police Lobbies Pressure Congress To Keep Their Military Equipment– RT

    CoIntelPro: The Untold American Story

    Violence In Ferguson Provacatuered By FBI And DHS– Infowars

    ISIS Terrorists: We’re Here In Ferguson– WND

  5. 9-11 was clearly the mother of all false flats.

    • RonMamita says:

      Mass murders – mass awakening – geopolitics – lying secretive sociopaths in executive positions of major institutions …
      Down the rabbit hole of the global Matrix controlling the People on Earth.

      Trillions of dollars went missing, in addition to tons of gold went missing, in addition to many financial investigations’ computer and paper files went missing; oh how convenient for institutional criminals!

      Wars were falsely justified and Afghanistan’s opium farms were captured to export new record levels of drug exports.

      The above are only a few of the many activities that came directly from that false flag operation, indeed the MOTHER of All False Flags!

    • RonMamita says:

      9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

      Judge Alfred Webre: 9/11 Tribunal active

      Sep 15, 2014

      9/11 Judge Alfred Webre: 9/11 Tribunal in session; Welcomes Witness & Experts’ evidence; Will issue Verdicts
      http://exopolitics.blogs.com/911_war_crimes_tribunal/2014/09/911-judge-alfred-webre-911-tribunal-in-session-welcomes-witness-experts-statements-will-issue-verdicts.html

      VANCOUVER, BC – Judge Alfred Lambremont Webre of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal here highlights the evidence the 9/11 Tribunal has received to date, and issues a call for 9/11 witnesses and experts to submit their sworn evidence to the Tribunal pending the Tribunal’s issuance of Verdicts under applicable international humanitarian law and criminal law in the false flag operation of September 11, 2001.

      The interview occurred on September 11, 2014 with host Donny Gillson of Truth Frequency radio and KBeach Radio 88.1 FM HD-3 Long Beach/Los Angeles.

      9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

      The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is a citizen’s tribunal of conscience that was duly constituted by the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings June 15-17, 2012 in Vancouver, B.C.

      Alfred Lambremont Webre, one of the Judges on the Tribunal states, “As a duly constituted citizen’s tribunal of conscience for the events of September 11, 2001, the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal has jurisdiction under natural law and justice; declarations of natural law, such as the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights; international humanitarian law such as the Geneva Conventions; and national laws such as national, state and provincial criminal statues prohibiting murder and conspiracy for any jurisdiction whose citizens died in the World Trace Center on 9/11. The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal was convened by a worldwide community of citizens who participated in the 911 Vancouver Hearings (June 15-17, 2012) in Vancouver, BC and via streaming internet from diverse locations around the world including the United States, India, and elsewhere.”

      During the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings, 19 expert witnesses gave sworn testimony as to names, titles, and implicating evidence for individuals, each of whom is alleged to have acted as part of a common plan as a leading co-conspirator in the events of 9/11 and for whom they are aware of prima facie evidence that is sufficient to raise a presumption of fact.

      9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Verdicts & Sentences

      Following the Hearings, these 19 sworn 9/11 expert witnesses and additional expert and eye witnesses filed further written submissions and affidavits with the 9/11 Vancouver War Crimes Tribunal as to individuals for whom there is prima facie evidence that they acted as part of a common plan in the events of 9/11. Each expert witness is asked to provide a detailed summary of implicating evidence for each such individual named.

      The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal has now called as of September 11, 2014, for additional 9/11 expert and witness evidence. From the totality of submitted evidence, the 9/11 Tribunal will develop and issue a Verdict of individuals found guilty to have participated in a criminal, common plan and conspiracy to carry out the events of September 11, 2001, together with Sentences for each.

      Legal implications of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

      Following the issuance 9/11 Verdicts and Sentences against specific named individuals who allegedly participated in a common plan and conspiracy in the events of 9/11, there are multiple legal venues in which the 9/11 Verdicts and Sentences can be enforced against the Guilty individuals, organizations and Nations.

      A. International law – The crimes of the Guilty individuals in the Verdicts may be found to violate the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and constitute war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity. At the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings Judge Alfred Webre stated, “The 9/11 false flag operations may qualify as a crime against peace, war crime, genocide, and crime against humanity, inter alia, if it can be demonstrated that the true intent of the 9/11 perpetrators was to carry out 9/11 as a pretext for invading Afghanistan, which invasion and war has been found to be genocidal because of the use of depleted uranium weapons and other reasons. So the legal chain of culpability is there, under the Nuremberg precedents of a crime against peace and starting an unjust war. The Tokyo Tribunal for War Crimes in Afghanistan, in an opinion by Judge Niloufer Bhagwat, found that U.S. President George W. Bush and his administration had committed war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity through the horrific birth defects and other widespread genetic and health damage cause to Afghan civilians through the U.S. use of depleted uranium weapons.”

      The 9/11 Verdicts and Sentences can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to the national courts of any of the more than 100 nations, such as Germany and Spain, that are signatories to the Rome statue of the International Criminal Court (ICC) for prosecution and enforcement, as well as to the ICC itself. A former chief prosecutor of the ICC, to the criticism of many throughout the world, has failed to act on over 400 complaints on war crimes in Iraq and in Afghanistan by US and UK forces, and has privately stated he will not take jurisdiction of 9/11.

      Organization of American States – According to one source, “The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal [Verdict and Sentence] can also be submitted to the Organization of American States (OAS) which might be an even better choice since it has the only international criminal court the U.S. has signed onto and the other OAS member countries may not be so biased in favor the U.S. One attorney took the U.S. government as a defendant there to get an opinion on the fact that the US used Depleted Uranium weapons on hospitals in Granada during the U.S. attack on Granada. She won and the U.S. had to rebuild all the hospitals they destroyed in Granada. She never would have achieved that victory in any other international courts.”

      B. U.S. Congress – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Verdict and Sentences can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to the U.S. Senate and to the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee for the appointment of a Special Prosecutor to prosecute the Accused Treason under Article III of the U.S. Constitution, which provides, “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.”

      There is legal precedent for such an action. In November 2007, a Memorandum was presented to senior Congressional staff and personally to Rep John Conyers, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee setting out sufficient prima facie evidence of Article III(3) treason in connection with the events of 9/11 by George W. Bush, Richard B. Cheney, Donald H. Rumsfeld, and other Jane and John Does. Senior Congressional staff acknowledged the seriousness of the allegations in the Memorandum. Rep. Conyers took the Memorandum home to Detroit, MI over the Thanksgiving 2007 holidays promising an answer as to whether he would move on the file after the Holidays. To this date, no answer has been forthcoming from Rep. Conyers.

      C. Canadian Parliament – There are various concurrent efforts to have the Parliament of Canada investigate the 9/11 events, as NORAD is a joint Canada/USA function and 26 Canadians were killed at the World Trade Center on 9/11. The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Verdicts and Sentences can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to members of Parliament and the Senate, including the Prime Minister and the Opposition Leaders in the Parliament of Canada to appoint a Public Inquiry to investigate and report on possible criminal violations by Canadian persons or U.S. persons, including U.S. government employees or contractors/agents, and other individuals flowing out of the 9/11 events.

      D. Prosecution for murder – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Verdict and Sentences can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to any District attorney and/or U.S. Attorneys in the United States of America, and to any Public Prosecutors in other nations whose citizens were killed in the World Trade Center or the events of 9/11. The alleged Accused, Co-conspirators and persons acting in a common plan to cause, facilitate or support the events of September 11, 2001 can each be prosecuted for murder by a U.S. attorney, by a district attorney or by public prosecutors of a nation whose citizens were killed at the World Trade Center or in any aspect of the false flag operation on September 11, 2001.

      9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

      Judges on the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal include Constance (Connie) Fogal, B.A, B.Ed, M.A., LL.B, and Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd. Connie Fogal is former leader of the Canadian Action Party, former Vancouver Parks Board Commissioner, former Director, Kitsilano and Vancouver Community Resource boards; lawyer with the Defence of Canadian Liberty Committee to oppose what Fogal sees as threats to Canadian constitutional sovereignty. Alfred Lambremont Webre, who has served as Judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, submitted a Memorandum to the Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee calling for the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate 9/11 and was a co-architect of the Space Preservation Treaty.

      The 9/11 Vancouver Hearings were organized by under Professor Jim Fetzer, PhD, McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, who edited its first book, THE 9/11 CONSPIRACY (2007), organized its first conference, “The Science and Politics of 9/11″ (Madison) and produced its first DVD; and co-organizer Joshua Blakeney, Graduate student at the University of Lethbridge, 9/11 activist, Staff Writer at Veterans Today, and now the Canadian correspondent for PressTV, who was awarded the Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship to study “The Origins of the Global War on Terror”.

      9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Judges Alfred Lambremont Webre & Constance Fogal, June 17, 2012

      VANCOUVER, B.C. – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is a citizen’s tribunal of conscience that was duly constituted by the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings June 15-17, 2012 in Vancouver, B.C.

      Alfred Lambremont Webre, one of the Judges on the Tribunal states, “As a duly constituted citizen’s tribunal of conscience for the events of September 11, 2001, the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal has jurisdiction under natural law and justice; declarations of natural law, such as the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights; international humanitarian law such as the Geneva Conventions; and national laws such as national, state and provincial criminal statues prohibiting murder and conspiracy for any jurisdiction whose citizens died in the World Trace Center on 9/11. The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal was convened by a worldwide community of citizens who participated in the 911 Vancouver Hearings (June 15-17, 2012) in Vancouver, BC and via streaming internet from diverse locations around the world including the United States, India, and elsewhere.”

      During the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings, 19 expert witnesses gave sworn testimony as to names, titles, and implicating evidence for individuals, each of whom is alleged to have acted as part of a common plan as a leading co-conspirator in the events of 9/11 and for whom they are aware of prima facie evidence that is sufficient to raise a presumption of fact.

      9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment

      Following the Hearings, these 19 sworn expert witnesses and additional expert and eye witnesses on 9/11 have been requested to file further written submissions and affidavits with the 9/11 Vancouver War Crimes Tribunal on or before July 15, 2012 as to individuals for whom there is prima facie evidence that they acted as part of a common plan in the events of 9/11. Each expert witness is being asked to provide a detailed summary of implicating evidence for each such individual named.

      Two of the conference organizers of the Vancouver Hearings, James Fetzer and Kevin Barrett, organized a boycott of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal following the Tribunal’s accepting into evidence of the affidavits of 9/11 eyewitness Andrew D. Basiago, Esq. and Leuren Moret, MA, PhD ABD. Most of the conference speakers joined the boycott and withdrew their evidentiary submissions from the Tribunal.

      The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal plans to call additional expert and eyewitnesses and develop and issue an Information and Indictment of individuals alleged to have participated in a criminal, common plan and conspiracy to carry out the events of September 11, 2001.

      At some point, with sufficient 9/11 expert and eye-witnesses, the 9/11 Tribunal will issue an indictment. The Information and Indictment will be accompanied by an Evidentiary Report, setting out the evidence of probable cause for the indictments of the Accused.

      Legal implications of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

      Following the issuance of an Information and Indictment against specific named individuals who allegedly participated in a common plan and conspiracy in the events of 9/11, there are multiple legal venues in which the criminal charges in the Information and Indictment can be prosecuted and tried, and verdicts and judgments reached and enforced against the Accused.

      A. International law – The alleged crimes of the Accused in the Information and Indictment may be found to violate the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and constitute war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity. At the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings Judge Alfred Webre stated, “The 9/11 false flag operations may qualify as a crime against peace, war crime, genocide, and crime against humanity, inter alia, if it can be demonstrated that the true intent of the 9/11 perpetrators was to carry out 9/11 as a pretext for invading Afghanistan, which invasion and war has been found to be genocidal because of the use of depleted uranium weapons and other reasons. So the legal chain of culpability is there, under the Nuremberg precedents of a crime against peace and starting an unjust war. The Tokyo Tribunal for War Crimes in Afghanistan, in an opinion by Judge Niloufer Bhagwat, found that U.S. President George W. Bush and his administration had committed war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity through the horrific birth defects and other widespread genetic and health damage cause to Afghan civilians through the U.S. use of depleted uranium weapons.”

      The 9/11 Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to the national courts of any of the more than 100 nations, such as Germany and Spain, that are signatories to the Rome statue of the International Criminal Court (ICC) for prosecution and enforcement, as well as to the ICC itself. The chief prosecutor of the ICC, to the criticism of many throughout the world, has failed to act on over 400 complaints on war crimes in Iraq and in Afghanistan by US and UK forces, and has privately stated he will not take jurisdiction of 9/11.
      Organization of American States – According to one source, “The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can also be submitted to the Organization of American States (OAS) which might be an even better choice since it has the only international criminal court the U.S. has signed onto and the other OAS member countries may not be so biased in favor the U.S. One attorney took the U.S. government as a defendant there to get an opinion on the fact that the US used Depleted Uranium weapons on hospitals in Granada during the U.S. attack on Granada. She won and the U.S. had to rebuild all the hospitals they destroyed in Granada. She never would have achieved that victory in any other international courts.”

      B. U.S. Congress – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to the U.S. Senate and to the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee for the appointment of a Special Prosecutor to prosecute the Accused Treason under Article III of the U.S. Constitution, which provides, “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.”

      There is legal precedent for such an action. In November 2007, a Memorandum was presented to senior Congressional staff and personally to Rep John Conyers, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee setting out sufficient prima facie evidence of Article III(3) treason in connection with the events of 9/11 by George W. Bush, Richard B. Cheney, Donald H. Rumsfeld, and other Jane and John Does. Senior Congressional staff acknowledged the seriousness of the allegations in the Memorandum. Rep. Conyers took the Memorandum home to Detroit, MI over the Thanksgiving 2007 holidays promising an answer as to whether he would move on the file after the Holidays. To this date, no answer has been forthcoming from Rep. Conyers.

      C. Canadian Parliament – There are various concurrent efforts to have the Parliament of Canada investigate the 9/11 events, as NORAD is a joint Canada/USA function and 26 Canadians were killed at the World Trade Center on 9/11. The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to members of Parliament and the Senate, including the Prime Minister and the Opposition Leaders in the Parliament of Canada to appoint a Public Inquiry to investigate and report on possible criminal violations by Canadian persons or U.S. persons, including U.S. government employees or contractors/agents, and other individuals flowing out of the 9/11 events.

      D. Prosecution for murder – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to any District attorney and/or U.S. Attorneys in the United States of America, and to any Public Prosecutors in other nations whose citizens were killed in the World Trade Center or the events of 9/11. The alleged Accused, Co-conspirators and persons acting in a common plan to cause, facilitate or support the events of September 11, 2001 can each be prosecuted for murder by a U.S. attorney, by a district attorney or by public prosecutors of a nation whose citizens were killed at the World Trade Center or in any aspect of the false flag operation on September 11, 2001.

      E. 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal can establish a formal Tribunal for a trial of the Accused under the 9/11 Vancouver Indictment. This trial would be heard by the 9/11 Tribunal Judges, with appointed prosecutors, counsel for the Accused and due process for the Accused. A sister tribunal of conscience, the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, has successfully tried George W. Bush, Tony Blair, Richard B. Cheney, Donald H. Rumsfeld, et al. for war crimes in Iraq.

      9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

      Judges on the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal include Constance (Connie) Fogal, B.A, B.Ed, M.A., LL.B, and Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd. Connie Fogal is former leader of the Canadian Action Party, former Vancouver Parks Board Commissioner, former Director, Kitsilano and Vancouver Community Resource boards; lawyer with the Defence of Canadian Liberty Committee to oppose what Fogal sees as threats to Canadian constitutional sovereignty. Alfred Lambremont Webre is a Judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, submitted a Memorandum to the Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee calling for the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate 9/11 and was a co-architect of the Space Preservation Treaty.

      The 9/11 Vancouver Hearings were organized by under Professor Jim Fetzer, PhD, McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, who edited its first book, THE 9/11 CONSPIRACY (2007), organized its first conference, “The Science and Politics of 9/11″ (Madison) and produced its first DVD; and co-organizer Joshua Blakeney, Graduate student at the University of Lethbridge, 9/11 activist, Staff Writer at Veterans Today, and now the Canadian correspondent for PressTV, who was awarded the Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship to study “The Origins of the Global War on Terror”.

      Information:
      http://www.911vancouverhearings.com

      Contact the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
      Email: tribunal@911warcrimestribunal.org
      – See more at: http://exopolitics.blogs.com/911_war_crimes_tribunal/2012/09/911-war-crimes-tribunal-expected-to-issue-indictments-of-accused-in-911-events-on-january-22-2013.html#sthash.uA37c8ID.dpuf

      9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Judges Alfred Lambremont Webre & Constance Fogal, June 17, 2012

      VANCOUVER, B.C. – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is a citizen’s tribunal of conscience that was duly constituted by the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings June 15-17, 2012 in Vancouver, B.C.

      Alfred Lambremont Webre, one of the Judges on the Tribunal states, “As a duly constituted citizen’s tribunal of conscience for the events of September 11, 2001, the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal has jurisdiction under natural law and justice; declarations of natural law, such as the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights; international humanitarian law such as the Geneva Conventions; and national laws such as national, state and provincial criminal statues prohibiting murder and conspiracy for any jurisdiction whose citizens died in the World Trace Center on 9/11. The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal was convened by a worldwide community of citizens who participated in the 911 Vancouver Hearings (June 15-17, 2012) in Vancouver, BC and via streaming internet from diverse locations around the world including the United States, India, and elsewhere.”

      During the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings, 19 expert witnesses gave sworn testimony as to names, titles, and implicating evidence for individuals, each of whom is alleged to have acted as part of a common plan as a leading co-conspirator in the events of 9/11 and for whom they are aware of prima facie evidence that is sufficient to raise a presumption of fact.

      9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment

      Following the Hearings, these 19 sworn expert witnesses and additional expert and eye witnesses on 9/11 have been requested to file further written submissions and affidavits with the 9/11 Vancouver War Crimes Tribunal on or before July 15, 2012 as to individuals for whom there is prima facie evidence that they acted as part of a common plan in the events of 9/11. Each expert witness is being asked to provide a detailed summary of implicating evidence for each such individual named.

      Two of the conference organizers of the Vancouver Hearings, James Fetzer and Kevin Barrett, organized a boycott of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal following the Tribunal’s accepting into evidence of the affidavits of 9/11 eyewitness Andrew D. Basiago, Esq. and Leuren Moret, MA, PhD ABD. Most of the conference speakers joined the boycott and withdrew their evidentiary submissions from the Tribunal.

      The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal plans to call additional expert and eyewitnesses and develop and issue an Information and Indictment of individuals alleged to have participated in a criminal, common plan and conspiracy to carry out the events of September 11, 2001.

      At some point, with sufficient 9/11 expert and eye-witnesses, the 9/11 Tribunal will issue an indictment. The Information and Indictment will be accompanied by an Evidentiary Report, setting out the evidence of probable cause for the indictments of the Accused.

      Legal implications of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

      Following the issuance of an Information and Indictment against specific named individuals who allegedly participated in a common plan and conspiracy in the events of 9/11, there are multiple legal venues in which the criminal charges in the Information and Indictment can be prosecuted and tried, and verdicts and judgments reached and enforced against the Accused.

      A. International law – The alleged crimes of the Accused in the Information and Indictment may be found to violate the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and constitute war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity. At the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings Judge Alfred Webre stated, “The 9/11 false flag operations may qualify as a crime against peace, war crime, genocide, and crime against humanity, inter alia, if it can be demonstrated that the true intent of the 9/11 perpetrators was to carry out 9/11 as a pretext for invading Afghanistan, which invasion and war has been found to be genocidal because of the use of depleted uranium weapons and other reasons. So the legal chain of culpability is there, under the Nuremberg precedents of a crime against peace and starting an unjust war. The Tokyo Tribunal for War Crimes in Afghanistan, in an opinion by Judge Niloufer Bhagwat, found that U.S. President George W. Bush and his administration had committed war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity through the horrific birth defects and other widespread genetic and health damage cause to Afghan civilians through the U.S. use of depleted uranium weapons.”

      The 9/11 Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to the national courts of any of the more than 100 nations, such as Germany and Spain, that are signatories to the Rome statue of the International Criminal Court (ICC) for prosecution and enforcement, as well as to the ICC itself. The chief prosecutor of the ICC, to the criticism of many throughout the world, has failed to act on over 400 complaints on war crimes in Iraq and in Afghanistan by US and UK forces, and has privately stated he will not take jurisdiction of 9/11.
      Organization of American States – According to one source, “The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can also be submitted to the Organization of American States (OAS) which might be an even better choice since it has the only international criminal court the U.S. has signed onto and the other OAS member countries may not be so biased in favor the U.S. One attorney took the U.S. government as a defendant there to get an opinion on the fact that the US used Depleted Uranium weapons on hospitals in Granada during the U.S. attack on Granada. She won and the U.S. had to rebuild all the hospitals they destroyed in Granada. She never would have achieved that victory in any other international courts.”

      B. U.S. Congress – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to the U.S. Senate and to the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee for the appointment of a Special Prosecutor to prosecute the Accused Treason under Article III of the U.S. Constitution, which provides, “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.”

      There is legal precedent for such an action. In November 2007, a Memorandum was presented to senior Congressional staff and personally to Rep John Conyers, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee setting out sufficient prima facie evidence of Article III(3) treason in connection with the events of 9/11 by George W. Bush, Richard B. Cheney, Donald H. Rumsfeld, and other Jane and John Does. Senior Congressional staff acknowledged the seriousness of the allegations in the Memorandum. Rep. Conyers took the Memorandum home to Detroit, MI over the Thanksgiving 2007 holidays promising an answer as to whether he would move on the file after the Holidays. To this date, no answer has been forthcoming from Rep. Conyers.

      C. Canadian Parliament – There are various concurrent efforts to have the Parliament of Canada investigate the 9/11 events, as NORAD is a joint Canada/USA function and 26 Canadians were killed at the World Trade Center on 9/11. The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to members of Parliament and the Senate, including the Prime Minister and the Opposition Leaders in the Parliament of Canada to appoint a Public Inquiry to investigate and report on possible criminal violations by Canadian persons or U.S. persons, including U.S. government employees or contractors/agents, and other individuals flowing out of the 9/11 events.

      D. Prosecution for murder – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to any District attorney and/or U.S. Attorneys in the United States of America, and to any Public Prosecutors in other nations whose citizens were killed in the World Trade Center or the events of 9/11. The alleged Accused, Co-conspirators and persons acting in a common plan to cause, facilitate or support the events of September 11, 2001 can each be prosecuted for murder by a U.S. attorney, by a district attorney or by public prosecutors of a nation whose citizens were killed at the World Trade Center or in any aspect of the false flag operation on September 11, 2001.

      E. 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal can establish a formal Tribunal for a trial of the Accused under the 9/11 Vancouver Indictment. This trial would be heard by the 9/11 Tribunal Judges, with appointed prosecutors, counsel for the Accused and due process for the Accused. A sister tribunal of conscience, the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, has successfully tried George W. Bush, Tony Blair, Richard B. Cheney, Donald H. Rumsfeld, et al. for war crimes in Iraq.

      9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

      Judges on the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal include Constance (Connie) Fogal, B.A, B.Ed, M.A., LL.B, and Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd. Connie Fogal is former leader of the Canadian Action Party, former Vancouver Parks Board Commissioner, former Director, Kitsilano and Vancouver Community Resource boards; lawyer with the Defence of Canadian Liberty Committee to oppose what Fogal sees as threats to Canadian constitutional sovereignty. Alfred Lambremont Webre is a Judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, submitted a Memorandum to the Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee calling for the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate 9/11 and was a co-architect of the Space Preservation Treaty.

      The 9/11 Vancouver Hearings were organized by under Professor Jim Fetzer, PhD, McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, who edited its first book, THE 9/11 CONSPIRACY (2007), organized its first conference, “The Science and Politics of 9/11″ (Madison) and produced its first DVD; and co-organizer Joshua Blakeney, Graduate student at the University of Lethbridge, 9/11 activist, Staff Writer at Veterans Today, and now the Canadian correspondent for PressTV, who was awarded the Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship to study “The Origins of the Global War on Terror”.

      Information:
      http://www.911vancouverhearings.com

      Contact the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
      Email: tribunal@911warcrimestribunal.org
      – See more at:
      http://exopolitics.blogs.com/911_war_crimes_tribunal/2012/09/911-war-crimes-tribunal-expected-to-issue-indictments-of-accused-in-911-events-on-january-22-2013.html#sthash.uA37c8ID.dpuf

      9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Judges Alfred Lambremont Webre & Constance Fogal, June 17, 2012

      VANCOUVER, B.C. – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is a citizen’s tribunal of conscience that was duly constituted by the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings June 15-17, 2012 in Vancouver, B.C.

      Alfred Lambremont Webre, one of the Judges on the Tribunal states, “As a duly constituted citizen’s tribunal of conscience for the events of September 11, 2001, the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal has jurisdiction under natural law and justice; declarations of natural law, such as the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights; international humanitarian law such as the Geneva Conventions; and national laws such as national, state and provincial criminal statues prohibiting murder and conspiracy for any jurisdiction whose citizens died in the World Trace Center on 9/11. The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal was convened by a worldwide community of citizens who participated in the 911 Vancouver Hearings (June 15-17, 2012) in Vancouver, BC and via streaming internet from diverse locations around the world including the United States, India, and elsewhere.”

      During the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings, 19 expert witnesses gave sworn testimony as to names, titles, and implicating evidence for individuals, each of whom is alleged to have acted as part of a common plan as a leading co-conspirator in the events of 9/11 and for whom they are aware of prima facie evidence that is sufficient to raise a presumption of fact.

      9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment

      Following the Hearings, these 19 sworn expert witnesses and additional expert and eye witnesses on 9/11 have been requested to file further written submissions and affidavits with the 9/11 Vancouver War Crimes Tribunal on or before July 15, 2012 as to individuals for whom there is prima facie evidence that they acted as part of a common plan in the events of 9/11. Each expert witness is being asked to provide a detailed summary of implicating evidence for each such individual named.

      Two of the conference organizers of the Vancouver Hearings, James Fetzer and Kevin Barrett, organized a boycott of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal following the Tribunal’s accepting into evidence of the affidavits of 9/11 eyewitness Andrew D. Basiago, Esq. and Leuren Moret, MA, PhD ABD. Most of the conference speakers joined the boycott and withdrew their evidentiary submissions from the Tribunal.

      The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal plans to call additional expert and eyewitnesses and develop and issue an Information and Indictment of individuals alleged to have participated in a criminal, common plan and conspiracy to carry out the events of September 11, 2001.

      At some point, with sufficient 9/11 expert and eye-witnesses, the 9/11 Tribunal will issue an indictment. The Information and Indictment will be accompanied by an Evidentiary Report, setting out the evidence of probable cause for the indictments of the Accused.

      Legal implications of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

      Following the issuance of an Information and Indictment against specific named individuals who allegedly participated in a common plan and conspiracy in the events of 9/11, there are multiple legal venues in which the criminal charges in the Information and Indictment can be prosecuted and tried, and verdicts and judgments reached and enforced against the Accused.

      A. International law – The alleged crimes of the Accused in the Information and Indictment may be found to violate the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and constitute war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity. At the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings Judge Alfred Webre stated, “The 9/11 false flag operations may qualify as a crime against peace, war crime, genocide, and crime against humanity, inter alia, if it can be demonstrated that the true intent of the 9/11 perpetrators was to carry out 9/11 as a pretext for invading Afghanistan, which invasion and war has been found to be genocidal because of the use of depleted uranium weapons and other reasons. So the legal chain of culpability is there, under the Nuremberg precedents of a crime against peace and starting an unjust war. The Tokyo Tribunal for War Crimes in Afghanistan, in an opinion by Judge Niloufer Bhagwat, found that U.S. President George W. Bush and his administration had committed war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity through the horrific birth defects and other widespread genetic and health damage cause to Afghan civilians through the U.S. use of depleted uranium weapons.”

      The 9/11 Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to the national courts of any of the more than 100 nations, such as Germany and Spain, that are signatories to the Rome statue of the International Criminal Court (ICC) for prosecution and enforcement, as well as to the ICC itself. The chief prosecutor of the ICC, to the criticism of many throughout the world, has failed to act on over 400 complaints on war crimes in Iraq and in Afghanistan by US and UK forces, and has privately stated he will not take jurisdiction of 9/11.
      Organization of American States – According to one source, “The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can also be submitted to the Organization of American States (OAS) which might be an even better choice since it has the only international criminal court the U.S. has signed onto and the other OAS member countries may not be so biased in favor the U.S. One attorney took the U.S. government as a defendant there to get an opinion on the fact that the US used Depleted Uranium weapons on hospitals in Granada during the U.S. attack on Granada. She won and the U.S. had to rebuild all the hospitals they destroyed in Granada. She never would have achieved that victory in any other international courts.”

      B. U.S. Congress – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to the U.S. Senate and to the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee for the appointment of a Special Prosecutor to prosecute the Accused Treason under Article III of the U.S. Constitution, which provides, “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.”

      There is legal precedent for such an action. In November 2007, a Memorandum was presented to senior Congressional staff and personally to Rep John Conyers, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee setting out sufficient prima facie evidence of Article III(3) treason in connection with the events of 9/11 by George W. Bush, Richard B. Cheney, Donald H. Rumsfeld, and other Jane and John Does. Senior Congressional staff acknowledged the seriousness of the allegations in the Memorandum. Rep. Conyers took the Memorandum home to Detroit, MI over the Thanksgiving 2007 holidays promising an answer as to whether he would move on the file after the Holidays. To this date, no answer has been forthcoming from Rep. Conyers.

      C. Canadian Parliament – There are various concurrent efforts to have the Parliament of Canada investigate the 9/11 events, as NORAD is a joint Canada/USA function and 26 Canadians were killed at the World Trade Center on 9/11. The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to members of Parliament and the Senate, including the Prime Minister and the Opposition Leaders in the Parliament of Canada to appoint a Public Inquiry to investigate and report on possible criminal violations by Canadian persons or U.S. persons, including U.S. government employees or contractors/agents, and other individuals flowing out of the 9/11 events.

      D. Prosecution for murder – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to any District attorney and/or U.S. Attorneys in the United States of America, and to any Public Prosecutors in other nations whose citizens were killed in the World Trade Center or the events of 9/11. The alleged Accused, Co-conspirators and persons acting in a common plan to cause, facilitate or support the events of September 11, 2001 can each be prosecuted for murder by a U.S. attorney, by a district attorney or by public prosecutors of a nation whose citizens were killed at the World Trade Center or in any aspect of the false flag operation on September 11, 2001.

      E. 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal can establish a formal Tribunal for a trial of the Accused under the 9/11 Vancouver Indictment. This trial would be heard by the 9/11 Tribunal Judges, with appointed prosecutors, counsel for the Accused and due process for the Accused. A sister tribunal of conscience, the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, has successfully tried George W. Bush, Tony Blair, Richard B. Cheney, Donald H. Rumsfeld, et al. for war crimes in Iraq.

      9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

      Judges on the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal include Constance (Connie) Fogal, B.A, B.Ed, M.A., LL.B, and Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd. Connie Fogal is former leader of the Canadian Action Party, former Vancouver Parks Board Commissioner, former Director, Kitsilano and Vancouver Community Resource boards; lawyer with the Defence of Canadian Liberty Committee to oppose what Fogal sees as threats to Canadian constitutional sovereignty. Alfred Lambremont Webre is a Judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, submitted a Memorandum to the Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee calling for the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate 9/11 and was a co-architect of the Space Preservation Treaty.

      The 9/11 Vancouver Hearings were organized by under Professor Jim Fetzer, PhD, McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, who edited its first book, THE 9/11 CONSPIRACY (2007), organized its first conference, “The Science and Politics of 9/11″ (Madison) and produced its first DVD; and co-organizer Joshua Blakeney, Graduate student at the University of Lethbridge, 9/11 activist, Staff Writer at Veterans Today, and now the Canadian correspondent for PressTV, who was awarded the Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship to study “The Origins of the Global War on Terror”.

      Information:
      http://www.911vancouverhearings.com

      Contact the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
      Email: tribunal@911warcrimestribunal.org
      – See more at: http://exopolitics.blogs.com/911_war_crimes_tribunal/2012/09/911-war-crimes-tribunal-expected-to-issue-indictments-of-accused-in-911-events-on-january-22-2013.html#sthash.uA37c8ID.dpuf

      References

      Contact:
      tribunal@911warcrimestribunal.org

      Information:
      http://www.911warcrimestribunal.org
      – See more at: http://exopolitics.blogs.com/911_war_crimes_tribunal/2014/09/911-judge-alfred-webre-911-tribunal-in-session-welcomes-witness-experts-statements-will-issue-verdicts.html#sthash.Pz0E4y6u.dpuf

Please Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 280 other followers

The Worldwide Wave of Action
Peaceful Global TransitionApril 4th, 2014
Exercise freedom and creativity for all Earth’s inhabitants to explore ready breakthroughs in Self Organizing Communities, economics, and technology. This is a D.I.Y. project
State Sponsored Terror
The Big Day ReportFebruary 2nd, 2014
Institutions of crime Big days have come and gone (government Elections, and Tax filing). Search for what is hidden and for what is not spoken. Be Aware of the next big Day for fraudulent institutions.
RonMamita
Peace Today

Peace Today

RonMamita’s Blog
September 2014
S M T W T F S
« Aug   Oct »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
All posts here
Whole-Community
Audio coming soon!
%d bloggers like this: