9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

The 9/11 strangeness continues with institutional governance, secrecy, and crimes; make of this what you will.
This information is presented “as is”, and regardless of how unusual it is, you can not say you have not heard about these unusual topics that are common in fiction and fantasy stories…
Judge Alfred Webre and his colleagues are serious about this criminal investigation, and they call for witnesses to contact them to add your affidavit to the investigation. ~Ron

Judge Alfred Webre: 9/11 Tribunal active


Sept. 15, 2014

9/11 Judge Alfred Webre: 9/11 Tribunal in session; Welcomes Witness & Experts’ evidence; Will issue Verdicts
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/911_war_crimes_tribunal/2014/09/911-judge-alfred-webre-911-tribunal-in-session-welcomes-witness-experts-statements-will-issue-verdicts.html

VANCOUVER, BC – Judge Alfred Lambremont Webre of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal here highlights the evidence the 9/11 Tribunal has received to date, and issues a call for 9/11 witnesses and experts to submit their sworn evidence to the Tribunal pending the Tribunal’s issuance of Verdicts under applicable international humanitarian law and criminal law in the false flag operation of September 11, 2001.

The interview occurred on September 11, 2014 with host Donny Gillson of Truth Frequency radio and KBeach Radio 88.1 FM HD-3 Long Beach/Los Angeles.

9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is a citizen’s tribunal of conscience that was duly constituted by the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings June 15-17, 2012 in Vancouver, B.C.

Alfred Lambremont Webre, one of the Judges on the Tribunal states, “As a duly constituted citizen’s tribunal of conscience for the events of September 11, 2001, the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal has jurisdiction under natural law and justice; declarations of natural law, such as the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights; international humanitarian law such as the Geneva Conventions; and national laws such as national, state and provincial criminal statues prohibiting murder and conspiracy for any jurisdiction whose citizens died in the World Trace Center on 9/11. The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal was convened by a worldwide community of citizens who participated in the 911 Vancouver Hearings (June 15-17, 2012) in Vancouver, BC and via streaming internet from diverse locations around the world including the United States, India, and elsewhere.”

During the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings, 19 expert witnesses gave sworn testimony as to names, titles, and implicating evidence for individuals, each of whom is alleged to have acted as part of a common plan as a leading co-conspirator in the events of 9/11 and for whom they are aware of prima facie evidence that is sufficient to raise a presumption of fact.

9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Verdicts & Sentences

Following the Hearings, these 19 sworn 9/11 expert witnesses and additional expert and eye witnesses filed further written submissions and affidavits with the 9/11 Vancouver War Crimes Tribunal as to individuals for whom there is prima facie evidence that they acted as part of a common plan in the events of 9/11. Each expert witness is asked to provide a detailed summary of implicating evidence for each such individual named.

The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal has now called as of September 11, 2014, for additional 9/11 expert and witness evidence. From the totality of submitted evidence, the 9/11 Tribunal will develop and issue a Verdict of individuals found guilty to have participated in a criminal, common plan and conspiracy to carry out the events of September 11, 2001, together with Sentences for each.

Legal implications of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

Following the issuance 9/11 Verdicts and Sentences against specific named individuals who allegedly participated in a common plan and conspiracy in the events of 9/11, there are multiple legal venues in which the 9/11 Verdicts and Sentences can be enforced against the Guilty individuals, organizations and Nations.

A. International law – The crimes of the Guilty individuals in the Verdicts may be found to violate the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and constitute war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity. At the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings Judge Alfred Webre stated, “The 9/11 false flag operations may qualify as a crime against peace, war crime, genocide, and crime against humanity, inter alia, if it can be demonstrated that the true intent of the 9/11 perpetrators was to carry out 9/11 as a pretext for invading Afghanistan, which invasion and war has been found to be genocidal because of the use of depleted uranium weapons and other reasons. So the legal chain of culpability is there, under the Nuremberg precedents of a crime against peace and starting an unjust war. The Tokyo Tribunal for War Crimes in Afghanistan, in an opinion by Judge Niloufer Bhagwat, found that U.S. President George W. Bush and his administration had committed war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity through the horrific birth defects and other widespread genetic and health damage cause to Afghan civilians through the U.S. use of depleted uranium weapons.”

The 9/11 Verdicts and Sentences can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to the national courts of any of the more than 100 nations, such as Germany and Spain, that are signatories to the Rome statue of the International Criminal Court (ICC) for prosecution and enforcement, as well as to the ICC itself. A former chief prosecutor of the ICC, to the criticism of many throughout the world, has failed to act on over 400 complaints on war crimes in Iraq and in Afghanistan by US and UK forces, and has privately stated he will not take jurisdiction of 9/11.

Organization of American States – According to one source, “The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal [Verdict and Sentence] can also be submitted to the Organization of American States (OAS) which might be an even better choice since it has the only international criminal court the U.S. has signed onto and the other OAS member countries may not be so biased in favor the U.S. One attorney took the U.S. government as a defendant there to get an opinion on the fact that the US used Depleted Uranium weapons on hospitals in Granada during the U.S. attack on Granada. She won and the U.S. had to rebuild all the hospitals they destroyed in Granada. She never would have achieved that victory in any other international courts.”

B. U.S. Congress – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Verdict and Sentences can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to the U.S. Senate and to the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee for the appointment of a Special Prosecutor to prosecute the Accused Treason under Article III of the U.S. Constitution, which provides, “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.”

There is legal precedent for such an action. In November 2007, a Memorandum was presented to senior Congressional staff and personally to Rep John Conyers, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee setting out sufficient prima facie evidence of Article III(3) treason in connection with the events of 9/11 by George W. Bush, Richard B. Cheney, Donald H. Rumsfeld, and other Jane and John Does. Senior Congressional staff acknowledged the seriousness of the allegations in the Memorandum. Rep. Conyers took the Memorandum home to Detroit, MI over the Thanksgiving 2007 holidays promising an answer as to whether he would move on the file after the Holidays. To this date, no answer has been forthcoming from Rep. Conyers.

C. Canadian Parliament – There are various concurrent efforts to have the Parliament of Canada investigate the 9/11 events, as NORAD is a joint Canada/USA function and 26 Canadians were killed at the World Trade Center on 9/11. The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Verdicts and Sentences can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to members of Parliament and the Senate, including the Prime Minister and the Opposition Leaders in the Parliament of Canada to appoint a Public Inquiry to investigate and report on possible criminal violations by Canadian persons or U.S. persons, including U.S. government employees or contractors/agents, and other individuals flowing out of the 9/11 events.

D. Prosecution for murder – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Verdict and Sentences can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to any District attorney and/or U.S. Attorneys in the United States of America, and to any Public Prosecutors in other nations whose citizens were killed in the World Trade Center or the events of 9/11. The alleged Accused, Co-conspirators and persons acting in a common plan to cause, facilitate or support the events of September 11, 2001 can each be prosecuted for murder by a U.S. attorney, by a district attorney or by public prosecutors of a nation whose citizens were killed at the World Trade Center or in any aspect of the false flag operation on September 11, 2001.

9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

Judges on the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal include Constance (Connie) Fogal, B.A, B.Ed, M.A., LL.B, and Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd. Connie Fogal is former leader of the Canadian Action Party, former Vancouver Parks Board Commissioner, former Director, Kitsilano and Vancouver Community Resource boards; lawyer with the Defence of Canadian Liberty Committee to oppose what Fogal sees as threats to Canadian constitutional sovereignty. Alfred Lambremont Webre, who has served as Judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, submitted a Memorandum to the Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee calling for the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate 9/11 and was a co-architect of the Space Preservation Treaty.

The 9/11 Vancouver Hearings were organized by under Professor Jim Fetzer, PhD, McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, who edited its first book, THE 9/11 CONSPIRACY (2007), organized its first conference, “The Science and Politics of 9/11″ (Madison) and produced its first DVD; and co-organizer Joshua Blakeney, Graduate student at the University of Lethbridge, 9/11 activist, Staff Writer at Veterans Today, and now the Canadian correspondent for PressTV, who was awarded the Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship to study “The Origins of the Global War on Terror”.

9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Judges Alfred Lambremont Webre & Constance Fogal, June 17, 2012

VANCOUVER, B.C. – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is a citizen’s tribunal of conscience that was duly constituted by the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings June 15-17, 2012 in Vancouver, B.C.

Alfred Lambremont Webre, one of the Judges on the Tribunal states, “As a duly constituted citizen’s tribunal of conscience for the events of September 11, 2001, the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal has jurisdiction under natural law and justice; declarations of natural law, such as the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights; international humanitarian law such as the Geneva Conventions; and national laws such as national, state and provincial criminal statues prohibiting murder and conspiracy for any jurisdiction whose citizens died in the World Trace Center on 9/11. The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal was convened by a worldwide community of citizens who participated in the 911 Vancouver Hearings (June 15-17, 2012) in Vancouver, BC and via streaming internet from diverse locations around the world including the United States, India, and elsewhere.”

During the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings, 19 expert witnesses gave sworn testimony as to names, titles, and implicating evidence for individuals, each of whom is alleged to have acted as part of a common plan as a leading co-conspirator in the events of 9/11 and for whom they are aware of prima facie evidence that is sufficient to raise a presumption of fact.

9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment

Following the Hearings, these 19 sworn expert witnesses and additional expert and eye witnesses on 9/11 have been requested to file further written submissions and affidavits with the 9/11 Vancouver War Crimes Tribunal on or before July 15, 2012 as to individuals for whom there is prima facie evidence that they acted as part of a common plan in the events of 9/11. Each expert witness is being asked to provide a detailed summary of implicating evidence for each such individual named.

Two of the conference organizers of the Vancouver Hearings, James Fetzer and Kevin Barrett, organized a boycott of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal following the Tribunal’s accepting into evidence of the affidavits of 9/11 eyewitness Andrew D. Basiago, Esq. and Leuren Moret, MA, PhD ABD. Most of the conference speakers joined the boycott and withdrew their evidentiary submissions from the Tribunal.

The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal plans to call additional expert and eyewitnesses and develop and issue an Information and Indictment of individuals alleged to have participated in a criminal, common plan and conspiracy to carry out the events of September 11, 2001.

At some point, with sufficient 9/11 expert and eye-witnesses, the 9/11 Tribunal will issue an indictment. The Information and Indictment will be accompanied by an Evidentiary Report, setting out the evidence of probable cause for the indictments of the Accused.

Legal implications of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

Following the issuance of an Information and Indictment against specific named individuals who allegedly participated in a common plan and conspiracy in the events of 9/11, there are multiple legal venues in which the criminal charges in the Information and Indictment can be prosecuted and tried, and verdicts and judgments reached and enforced against the Accused.

A. International law – The alleged crimes of the Accused in the Information and Indictment may be found to violate the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and constitute war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity. At the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings Judge Alfred Webre stated, “The 9/11 false flag operations may qualify as a crime against peace, war crime, genocide, and crime against humanity, inter alia, if it can be demonstrated that the true intent of the 9/11 perpetrators was to carry out 9/11 as a pretext for invading Afghanistan, which invasion and war has been found to be genocidal because of the use of depleted uranium weapons and other reasons. So the legal chain of culpability is there, under the Nuremberg precedents of a crime against peace and starting an unjust war. The Tokyo Tribunal for War Crimes in Afghanistan, in an opinion by Judge Niloufer Bhagwat, found that U.S. President George W. Bush and his administration had committed war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity through the horrific birth defects and other widespread genetic and health damage cause to Afghan civilians through the U.S. use of depleted uranium weapons.”

The 9/11 Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to the national courts of any of the more than 100 nations, such as Germany and Spain, that are signatories to the Rome statue of the International Criminal Court (ICC) for prosecution and enforcement, as well as to the ICC itself. The chief prosecutor of the ICC, to the criticism of many throughout the world, has failed to act on over 400 complaints on war crimes in Iraq and in Afghanistan by US and UK forces, and has privately stated he will not take jurisdiction of 9/11.
Organization of American States – According to one source, “The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can also be submitted to the Organization of American States (OAS) which might be an even better choice since it has the only international criminal court the U.S. has signed onto and the other OAS member countries may not be so biased in favor the U.S. One attorney took the U.S. government as a defendant there to get an opinion on the fact that the US used Depleted Uranium weapons on hospitals in Granada during the U.S. attack on Granada. She won and the U.S. had to rebuild all the hospitals they destroyed in Granada. She never would have achieved that victory in any other international courts.”

B. U.S. Congress – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to the U.S. Senate and to the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee for the appointment of a Special Prosecutor to prosecute the Accused Treason under Article III of the U.S. Constitution, which provides, “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.”

There is legal precedent for such an action. In November 2007, a Memorandum was presented to senior Congressional staff and personally to Rep John Conyers, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee setting out sufficient prima facie evidence of Article III(3) treason in connection with the events of 9/11 by George W. Bush, Richard B. Cheney, Donald H. Rumsfeld, and other Jane and John Does. Senior Congressional staff acknowledged the seriousness of the allegations in the Memorandum. Rep. Conyers took the Memorandum home to Detroit, MI over the Thanksgiving 2007 holidays promising an answer as to whether he would move on the file after the Holidays. To this date, no answer has been forthcoming from Rep. Conyers.

C. Canadian Parliament – There are various concurrent efforts to have the Parliament of Canada investigate the 9/11 events, as NORAD is a joint Canada/USA function and 26 Canadians were killed at the World Trade Center on 9/11. The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to members of Parliament and the Senate, including the Prime Minister and the Opposition Leaders in the Parliament of Canada to appoint a Public Inquiry to investigate and report on possible criminal violations by Canadian persons or U.S. persons, including U.S. government employees or contractors/agents, and other individuals flowing out of the 9/11 events.

D. Prosecution for murder – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to any District attorney and/or U.S. Attorneys in the United States of America, and to any Public Prosecutors in other nations whose citizens were killed in the World Trade Center or the events of 9/11. The alleged Accused, Co-conspirators and persons acting in a common plan to cause, facilitate or support the events of September 11, 2001 can each be prosecuted for murder by a U.S. attorney, by a district attorney or by public prosecutors of a nation whose citizens were killed at the World Trade Center or in any aspect of the false flag operation on September 11, 2001.

E. 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal can establish a formal Tribunal for a trial of the Accused under the 9/11 Vancouver Indictment. This trial would be heard by the 9/11 Tribunal Judges, with appointed prosecutors, counsel for the Accused and due process for the Accused. A sister tribunal of conscience, the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, has successfully tried George W. Bush, Tony Blair, Richard B. Cheney, Donald H. Rumsfeld, et al. for war crimes in Iraq.

9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

Judges on the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal include Constance (Connie) Fogal, B.A, B.Ed, M.A., LL.B, and Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd. Connie Fogal is former leader of the Canadian Action Party, former Vancouver Parks Board Commissioner, former Director, Kitsilano and Vancouver Community Resource boards; lawyer with the Defence of Canadian Liberty Committee to oppose what Fogal sees as threats to Canadian constitutional sovereignty. Alfred Lambremont Webre is a Judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, submitted a Memorandum to the Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee calling for the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate 9/11 and was a co-architect of the Space Preservation Treaty.

The 9/11 Vancouver Hearings were organized by under Professor Jim Fetzer, PhD, McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, who edited its first book, THE 9/11 CONSPIRACY (2007), organized its first conference, “The Science and Politics of 9/11″ (Madison) and produced its first DVD; and co-organizer Joshua Blakeney, Graduate student at the University of Lethbridge, 9/11 activist, Staff Writer at Veterans Today, and now the Canadian correspondent for PressTV, who was awarded the Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship to study “The Origins of the Global War on Terror”.

Information:
http://www.911vancouverhearings.com

Contact the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
Email: tribunal@911warcrimestribunal.org
– See more at: http://exopolitics.blogs.com/911_war_crimes_tribunal/2012/09/911-war-crimes-tribunal-expected-to-issue-indictments-of-accused-in-911-events-on-january-22-2013.html#sthash.uA37c8ID.dpuf

9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Judges Alfred Lambremont Webre & Constance Fogal, June 17, 2012

VANCOUVER, B.C. – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is a citizen’s tribunal of conscience that was duly constituted by the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings June 15-17, 2012 in Vancouver, B.C.

Alfred Lambremont Webre, one of the Judges on the Tribunal states, “As a duly constituted citizen’s tribunal of conscience for the events of September 11, 2001, the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal has jurisdiction under natural law and justice; declarations of natural law, such as the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights; international humanitarian law such as the Geneva Conventions; and national laws such as national, state and provincial criminal statues prohibiting murder and conspiracy for any jurisdiction whose citizens died in the World Trace Center on 9/11. The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal was convened by a worldwide community of citizens who participated in the 911 Vancouver Hearings (June 15-17, 2012) in Vancouver, BC and via streaming internet from diverse locations around the world including the United States, India, and elsewhere.”

During the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings, 19 expert witnesses gave sworn testimony as to names, titles, and implicating evidence for individuals, each of whom is alleged to have acted as part of a common plan as a leading co-conspirator in the events of 9/11 and for whom they are aware of prima facie evidence that is sufficient to raise a presumption of fact.

9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment

Following the Hearings, these 19 sworn expert witnesses and additional expert and eye witnesses on 9/11 have been requested to file further written submissions and affidavits with the 9/11 Vancouver War Crimes Tribunal on or before July 15, 2012 as to individuals for whom there is prima facie evidence that they acted as part of a common plan in the events of 9/11. Each expert witness is being asked to provide a detailed summary of implicating evidence for each such individual named.

Two of the conference organizers of the Vancouver Hearings, James Fetzer and Kevin Barrett, organized a boycott of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal following the Tribunal’s accepting into evidence of the affidavits of 9/11 eyewitness Andrew D. Basiago, Esq. and Leuren Moret, MA, PhD ABD. Most of the conference speakers joined the boycott and withdrew their evidentiary submissions from the Tribunal.

The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal plans to call additional expert and eyewitnesses and develop and issue an Information and Indictment of individuals alleged to have participated in a criminal, common plan and conspiracy to carry out the events of September 11, 2001.

At some point, with sufficient 9/11 expert and eye-witnesses, the 9/11 Tribunal will issue an indictment. The Information and Indictment will be accompanied by an Evidentiary Report, setting out the evidence of probable cause for the indictments of the Accused.

Legal implications of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

Following the issuance of an Information and Indictment against specific named individuals who allegedly participated in a common plan and conspiracy in the events of 9/11, there are multiple legal venues in which the criminal charges in the Information and Indictment can be prosecuted and tried, and verdicts and judgments reached and enforced against the Accused.

A. International law – The alleged crimes of the Accused in the Information and Indictment may be found to violate the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and constitute war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity. At the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings Judge Alfred Webre stated, “The 9/11 false flag operations may qualify as a crime against peace, war crime, genocide, and crime against humanity, inter alia, if it can be demonstrated that the true intent of the 9/11 perpetrators was to carry out 9/11 as a pretext for invading Afghanistan, which invasion and war has been found to be genocidal because of the use of depleted uranium weapons and other reasons. So the legal chain of culpability is there, under the Nuremberg precedents of a crime against peace and starting an unjust war. The Tokyo Tribunal for War Crimes in Afghanistan, in an opinion by Judge Niloufer Bhagwat, found that U.S. President George W. Bush and his administration had committed war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity through the horrific birth defects and other widespread genetic and health damage cause to Afghan civilians through the U.S. use of depleted uranium weapons.”

The 9/11 Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to the national courts of any of the more than 100 nations, such as Germany and Spain, that are signatories to the Rome statue of the International Criminal Court (ICC) for prosecution and enforcement, as well as to the ICC itself. The chief prosecutor of the ICC, to the criticism of many throughout the world, has failed to act on over 400 complaints on war crimes in Iraq and in Afghanistan by US and UK forces, and has privately stated he will not take jurisdiction of 9/11.
Organization of American States – According to one source, “The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can also be submitted to the Organization of American States (OAS) which might be an even better choice since it has the only international criminal court the U.S. has signed onto and the other OAS member countries may not be so biased in favor the U.S. One attorney took the U.S. government as a defendant there to get an opinion on the fact that the US used Depleted Uranium weapons on hospitals in Granada during the U.S. attack on Granada. She won and the U.S. had to rebuild all the hospitals they destroyed in Granada. She never would have achieved that victory in any other international courts.”

B. U.S. Congress – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to the U.S. Senate and to the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee for the appointment of a Special Prosecutor to prosecute the Accused Treason under Article III of the U.S. Constitution, which provides, “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.”

There is legal precedent for such an action. In November 2007, a Memorandum was presented to senior Congressional staff and personally to Rep John Conyers, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee setting out sufficient prima facie evidence of Article III(3) treason in connection with the events of 9/11 by George W. Bush, Richard B. Cheney, Donald H. Rumsfeld, and other Jane and John Does. Senior Congressional staff acknowledged the seriousness of the allegations in the Memorandum. Rep. Conyers took the Memorandum home to Detroit, MI over the Thanksgiving 2007 holidays promising an answer as to whether he would move on the file after the Holidays. To this date, no answer has been forthcoming from Rep. Conyers.

C. Canadian Parliament – There are various concurrent efforts to have the Parliament of Canada investigate the 9/11 events, as NORAD is a joint Canada/USA function and 26 Canadians were killed at the World Trade Center on 9/11. The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to members of Parliament and the Senate, including the Prime Minister and the Opposition Leaders in the Parliament of Canada to appoint a Public Inquiry to investigate and report on possible criminal violations by Canadian persons or U.S. persons, including U.S. government employees or contractors/agents, and other individuals flowing out of the 9/11 events.

D. Prosecution for murder – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to any District attorney and/or U.S. Attorneys in the United States of America, and to any Public Prosecutors in other nations whose citizens were killed in the World Trade Center or the events of 9/11. The alleged Accused, Co-conspirators and persons acting in a common plan to cause, facilitate or support the events of September 11, 2001 can each be prosecuted for murder by a U.S. attorney, by a district attorney or by public prosecutors of a nation whose citizens were killed at the World Trade Center or in any aspect of the false flag operation on September 11, 2001.

E. 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal can establish a formal Tribunal for a trial of the Accused under the 9/11 Vancouver Indictment. This trial would be heard by the 9/11 Tribunal Judges, with appointed prosecutors, counsel for the Accused and due process for the Accused. A sister tribunal of conscience, the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, has successfully tried George W. Bush, Tony Blair, Richard B. Cheney, Donald H. Rumsfeld, et al. for war crimes in Iraq.

9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

Judges on the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal include Constance (Connie) Fogal, B.A, B.Ed, M.A., LL.B, and Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd. Connie Fogal is former leader of the Canadian Action Party, former Vancouver Parks Board Commissioner, former Director, Kitsilano and Vancouver Community Resource boards; lawyer with the Defence of Canadian Liberty Committee to oppose what Fogal sees as threats to Canadian constitutional sovereignty. Alfred Lambremont Webre is a Judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, submitted a Memorandum to the Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee calling for the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate 9/11 and was a co-architect of the Space Preservation Treaty.

The 9/11 Vancouver Hearings were organized by under Professor Jim Fetzer, PhD, McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, who edited its first book, THE 9/11 CONSPIRACY (2007), organized its first conference, “The Science and Politics of 9/11″ (Madison) and produced its first DVD; and co-organizer Joshua Blakeney, Graduate student at the University of Lethbridge, 9/11 activist, Staff Writer at Veterans Today, and now the Canadian correspondent for PressTV, who was awarded the Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship to study “The Origins of the Global War on Terror”.

Information:
http://www.911vancouverhearings.com

Contact the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
Email: tribunal@911warcrimestribunal.org
– See more at:
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/911_war_crimes_tribunal/2012/09/911-war-crimes-tribunal-expected-to-issue-indictments-of-accused-in-911-events-on-january-22-2013.html#sthash.uA37c8ID.dpuf

9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Judges Alfred Lambremont Webre & Constance Fogal, June 17, 2012

VANCOUVER, B.C. – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is a citizen’s tribunal of conscience that was duly constituted by the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings June 15-17, 2012 in Vancouver, B.C.

Alfred Lambremont Webre, one of the Judges on the Tribunal states, “As a duly constituted citizen’s tribunal of conscience for the events of September 11, 2001, the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal has jurisdiction under natural law and justice; declarations of natural law, such as the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights; international humanitarian law such as the Geneva Conventions; and national laws such as national, state and provincial criminal statues prohibiting murder and conspiracy for any jurisdiction whose citizens died in the World Trace Center on 9/11. The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal was convened by a worldwide community of citizens who participated in the 911 Vancouver Hearings (June 15-17, 2012) in Vancouver, BC and via streaming internet from diverse locations around the world including the United States, India, and elsewhere.”

During the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings, 19 expert witnesses gave sworn testimony as to names, titles, and implicating evidence for individuals, each of whom is alleged to have acted as part of a common plan as a leading co-conspirator in the events of 9/11 and for whom they are aware of prima facie evidence that is sufficient to raise a presumption of fact.

9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment

Following the Hearings, these 19 sworn expert witnesses and additional expert and eye witnesses on 9/11 have been requested to file further written submissions and affidavits with the 9/11 Vancouver War Crimes Tribunal on or before July 15, 2012 as to individuals for whom there is prima facie evidence that they acted as part of a common plan in the events of 9/11. Each expert witness is being asked to provide a detailed summary of implicating evidence for each such individual named.

Two of the conference organizers of the Vancouver Hearings, James Fetzer and Kevin Barrett, organized a boycott of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal following the Tribunal’s accepting into evidence of the affidavits of 9/11 eyewitness Andrew D. Basiago, Esq. and Leuren Moret, MA, PhD ABD. Most of the conference speakers joined the boycott and withdrew their evidentiary submissions from the Tribunal.

The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal plans to call additional expert and eyewitnesses and develop and issue an Information and Indictment of individuals alleged to have participated in a criminal, common plan and conspiracy to carry out the events of September 11, 2001.

At some point, with sufficient 9/11 expert and eye-witnesses, the 9/11 Tribunal will issue an indictment. The Information and Indictment will be accompanied by an Evidentiary Report, setting out the evidence of probable cause for the indictments of the Accused.

Legal implications of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

Following the issuance of an Information and Indictment against specific named individuals who allegedly participated in a common plan and conspiracy in the events of 9/11, there are multiple legal venues in which the criminal charges in the Information and Indictment can be prosecuted and tried, and verdicts and judgments reached and enforced against the Accused.

A. International law – The alleged crimes of the Accused in the Information and Indictment may be found to violate the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and constitute war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity. At the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings Judge Alfred Webre stated, “The 9/11 false flag operations may qualify as a crime against peace, war crime, genocide, and crime against humanity, inter alia, if it can be demonstrated that the true intent of the 9/11 perpetrators was to carry out 9/11 as a pretext for invading Afghanistan, which invasion and war has been found to be genocidal because of the use of depleted uranium weapons and other reasons. So the legal chain of culpability is there, under the Nuremberg precedents of a crime against peace and starting an unjust war. The Tokyo Tribunal for War Crimes in Afghanistan, in an opinion by Judge Niloufer Bhagwat, found that U.S. President George W. Bush and his administration had committed war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity through the horrific birth defects and other widespread genetic and health damage cause to Afghan civilians through the U.S. use of depleted uranium weapons.”

The 9/11 Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to the national courts of any of the more than 100 nations, such as Germany and Spain, that are signatories to the Rome statue of the International Criminal Court (ICC) for prosecution and enforcement, as well as to the ICC itself. The chief prosecutor of the ICC, to the criticism of many throughout the world, has failed to act on over 400 complaints on war crimes in Iraq and in Afghanistan by US and UK forces, and has privately stated he will not take jurisdiction of 9/11.
Organization of American States – According to one source, “The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can also be submitted to the Organization of American States (OAS) which might be an even better choice since it has the only international criminal court the U.S. has signed onto and the other OAS member countries may not be so biased in favor the U.S. One attorney took the U.S. government as a defendant there to get an opinion on the fact that the US used Depleted Uranium weapons on hospitals in Granada during the U.S. attack on Granada. She won and the U.S. had to rebuild all the hospitals they destroyed in Granada. She never would have achieved that victory in any other international courts.”

B. U.S. Congress – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to the U.S. Senate and to the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee for the appointment of a Special Prosecutor to prosecute the Accused Treason under Article III of the U.S. Constitution, which provides, “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.”

There is legal precedent for such an action. In November 2007, a Memorandum was presented to senior Congressional staff and personally to Rep John Conyers, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee setting out sufficient prima facie evidence of Article III(3) treason in connection with the events of 9/11 by George W. Bush, Richard B. Cheney, Donald H. Rumsfeld, and other Jane and John Does. Senior Congressional staff acknowledged the seriousness of the allegations in the Memorandum. Rep. Conyers took the Memorandum home to Detroit, MI over the Thanksgiving 2007 holidays promising an answer as to whether he would move on the file after the Holidays. To this date, no answer has been forthcoming from Rep. Conyers.

C. Canadian Parliament – There are various concurrent efforts to have the Parliament of Canada investigate the 9/11 events, as NORAD is a joint Canada/USA function and 26 Canadians were killed at the World Trade Center on 9/11. The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to members of Parliament and the Senate, including the Prime Minister and the Opposition Leaders in the Parliament of Canada to appoint a Public Inquiry to investigate and report on possible criminal violations by Canadian persons or U.S. persons, including U.S. government employees or contractors/agents, and other individuals flowing out of the 9/11 events.

D. Prosecution for murder – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to any District attorney and/or U.S. Attorneys in the United States of America, and to any Public Prosecutors in other nations whose citizens were killed in the World Trade Center or the events of 9/11. The alleged Accused, Co-conspirators and persons acting in a common plan to cause, facilitate or support the events of September 11, 2001 can each be prosecuted for murder by a U.S. attorney, by a district attorney or by public prosecutors of a nation whose citizens were killed at the World Trade Center or in any aspect of the false flag operation on September 11, 2001.

E. 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal can establish a formal Tribunal for a trial of the Accused under the 9/11 Vancouver Indictment. This trial would be heard by the 9/11 Tribunal Judges, with appointed prosecutors, counsel for the Accused and due process for the Accused. A sister tribunal of conscience, the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, has successfully tried George W. Bush, Tony Blair, Richard B. Cheney, Donald H. Rumsfeld, et al. for war crimes in Iraq.

9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

Judges on the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal include Constance (Connie) Fogal, B.A, B.Ed, M.A., LL.B, and Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd. Connie Fogal is former leader of the Canadian Action Party, former Vancouver Parks Board Commissioner, former Director, Kitsilano and Vancouver Community Resource boards; lawyer with the Defence of Canadian Liberty Committee to oppose what Fogal sees as threats to Canadian constitutional sovereignty. Alfred Lambremont Webre is a Judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, submitted a Memorandum to the Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee calling for the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate 9/11 and was a co-architect of the Space Preservation Treaty.

The 9/11 Vancouver Hearings were organized by under Professor Jim Fetzer, PhD, McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, who edited its first book, THE 9/11 CONSPIRACY (2007), organized its first conference, “The Science and Politics of 9/11″ (Madison) and produced its first DVD; and co-organizer Joshua Blakeney, Graduate student at the University of Lethbridge, 9/11 activist, Staff Writer at Veterans Today, and now the Canadian correspondent for PressTV, who was awarded the Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship to study “The Origins of the Global War on Terror”.

Information:
http://www.911vancouverhearings.com

Contact the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
Email: tribunal@911warcrimestribunal.org
– See more at: http://exopolitics.blogs.com/911_war_crimes_tribunal/2012/09/911-war-crimes-tribunal-expected-to-issue-indictments-of-accused-in-911-events-on-january-22-2013.html#sthash.uA37c8ID.dpuf

References

Contact:
tribunal@911warcrimestribunal.org

Information:
http://www.911warcrimestribunal.org
– See more at: http://exopolitics.blogs.com/911_war_crimes_tribunal/2014/09/911-judge-alfred-webre-911-tribunal-in-session-welcomes-witness-experts-statements-will-issue-verdicts.html#sthash.Pz0E4y6u.dpuf
.

RELATED:
https://ronmamita.wordpress.com/video-room/documents/
https://ronmamita.wordpress.com/2012/12/21/thoughts-to-question-and-ponder/
https://ronmamita.wordpress.com/2012/12/02/cheers-to-whistle-blowers/
https://ronmamita.wordpress.com/2014/02/26/former-fbi-chief-admits-chemtrails-are-real/
Susan Lindauer

About

Want Worldwide PEACE and Prosperity. We are the solution we have been searching for... Free People of Earth will solve our crisis and create an era of Creativity. Be at Peace; Be Aware; Be Creative; Be Active; Be Free and Alive; and then Share it. LOVE & Peace AMOR y Paz

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Freedom-Expressed
3 comments on “9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
  1. RonMamita says:

    Speaking of “STRANGENESS”…

    1. HAWKING WARNS ABOUT THE HIGGS:A DEEPER LURKING STORY?
    http://gizadeathstar.com/2014/09/hawking-warns-higgsa-deeper-lurking-story/

    some physicists have been dismayed over the results of the Large Hadron Collider experiments, and their inability to find not only the Higgs, but several other particles predicted by the theory…

    2A. DARPA’S HUNT FOR SPACE-TIME VULNERABILITIES IN ALGORITHMS: PART ONE
    http://gizadeathstar.com/2014/09/darpas-hunt-space-time-vulnerabilities-algorithms-part-one/

    does HFT or High Frequency Trading really reflect the human market, or is it more reflective of a massive disconnect between the “matrix-like” reality of modern financial markets, and human markets. It also goes without saying that with the massive computational ability and surveillance programs of the modern state and corporation, that some of these programs could easily constitute the most sophisticated kind of “inside trading” mechanism(concerns voiced by those looking at the HFT phenomenon) due to their implicit predictive capabilities.
    […]

    2B. DARPA’S HUNT FOR SPACE-TIME VULNERABILITIES IN ALGORITHMS: PART TWO
    http://gizadeathstar.com/2014/09/darpas-hunt-space-time-vulnerabilities-algorithms-part-two/

    The question is why DARPA would be exploring these types of possibilities, beyond the obvious and justifiable purpose of protecting national electronic communications of all sorts, government, corporate, private, and personal.
    Source:
    http://defensesystems.com/articles/2014/09/10/darpa-stac-space-time-vulnerabilities.aspx?admgarea=DS

    “Instead, the STAC program is looking at new program analysis techniques that could allow analysts to find those vulnerabilities and predict where leaks and denial of service might be possible. These new techniques and tools would enable a methodical search for vulnerabilities in critical government, military and economic software.

    “For those tools, the program is looking for scale and speed. With regard to scale, the techniques would have to be capable of handling larger software, ranging from hundreds of thousands to several million lines of source code. They will also have work quickly by increasing precision and reducing the need for manual annotation.”

    3. Gulf of Alaska Is Unusually Warm, ‘Weird Fish Are Showing Up’

    The warming began last year in the Gulf of Alaska and has since been dubbed “The Blob” by Nick Bond, of the Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean. Temperatures have been as high as about 5 degrees Fahrenheit (3 Celsius) above average.

    Normally storms and winds roll through to cool off the surface of the Northern Pacific, but a weather pattern popped up for a few months in winter 2013 that inhibited those storms from developing, said Nate Mantua, a NOAA research scientist. Then, from October 2013 through January, the weather pattern came back as a ridge of high pressure (the same one connected to the California drought). All of that made the already warm waters in the Alaskan gulf even warmer, a layer about 100 meters thick, Mantua said.
    Source:
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2014/09/15/the-gulf-of-alaska-is-unusually-warm-and-weird-fish-are-showing-up/?Post+generic=%3Ftid%3Dsm_twitter_washingtonpost

    4. Tony Rooke Wins Court Case Against BBC for 9/11 Cover Up!

    Tony Rooke refused to pay a TV license fee because the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the 9/11 attacks, he alleged. It is widely known that the BBC reported the collapse of World

    Trade Center Building 7 over 20 minutes before it occurred. WTC 7 was a 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by a plane on 9/11 but collapsed at free-fall speed later that day.

    So Rooke said the BBC had to have had prior knowledge to a terror attack making them complicit in the attack. He presented the BBC footage to the judge along with a slew of other evidence, and the judge agreed that Rooke had a reasonable case to protest. Rooke was found not guilty and he was not fined for failure to pay the licensing fee.
    Source:
    http://topinfopost.com/2013/04/28/uk-man-wins-court-case-against-bbc-for-911-cover-up

  2. RonMamita says:

    9/11 Firefighter Blows WTC 7 Cover-Up Wide Open

    Sep 11, 2014

    Infowars reporter Lee Ann McAdoo talks to Rudy Dent, 32 year veteran of NYC fire department and the NYPD, about his incredible first hand experience of the lies surrounding WTC 7.

Please Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 285 other followers

The Worldwide Wave of Action
Peaceful Global TransitionApril 4th, 2014
Exercise freedom and creativity for all Earth’s inhabitants to explore ready breakthroughs in Self Organizing Communities, economics, and technology. This is a D.I.Y. project
State Sponsored Terror
The Big Day ReportFebruary 2nd, 2014
Institutions of crime Big days have come and gone (government Elections, and Tax filing). Search for what is hidden and for what is not spoken. Be Aware of the next big Day for fraudulent institutions.
RonMamita
Peace Today

Peace Today

RonMamita’s Blog
September 2014
S M T W T F S
« Aug   Oct »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
All posts here
Whole-Community
Audio coming soon!
%d bloggers like this: