China and the NWO

chinese-yuan-vs-us-dollar
We thank James Corbett for his tireless efforts and research of behind the closed doors of geopolitics and the money masters that fund and direct the institutions of the world.
All is not as it seems or as it is portrayed in the news media.
This week the political stage is in China as the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation, “APEC“, Summit for international corporations and trade is taking place.

Is China an opponent to the New World Order global governmental system or a co-conspirator?

Some people are focused on the emergence of the BRICS and SCO nations withdrawing support for the U.S. Dollar as the international means for trade. However the two trade agreements (China endorsed FTAAP, and U.S. endorsed TPP) are not revealed widely to the public. That secrecy says a lot about the entire negotiations.
Why is China internet still so heavily controlled and restricted?
Why are discussions to abolish fractional reserve banking not leading the negotiations for monetary reform?
We remind readers that wars and crisis are managed to forward an agenda, and many false flags have been documented over the centuries that started crisis and war for a hidden agenda. Deception is the art of war.

“Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win”

Never allow a crisis to go to waste, or rather engineer a crisis that begs for your ready solution…
Could we be witnessing a geopolitical plan that involves officials of the central banks and the wealthiest nations to reset the international monetary system in the East after a international currency crisis, and could they be willing to have military conflict to enforce this policy?
There is much evidence that reveals that an entity has a ongoing war against the People on Earth and often disguises it as a war among nations or terrorists or other forces…
Control over the People is the meme of empires and of nation states.

Do not fall into the limited view of only two opposing sides, as in the 2 party politics, or conservatives vs liberals, or good vs bad, or WEST vs EAST false dichotomies.
We must be willing to search for multiple forces, multiple agendas, and along with it comes multiple solutions.
We can count past two! Often institutional agendas are multifaceted and hiding behind doors number 1 through three or six or more doors and yet another conspirator with an agenda is lurking.
Be willing to investigate all governing institutions for hidden agendas with deadly secrets. ~Ron

Episode 297 – China and the New World Order

Military tensions, cyber espionage accusations, a brewing currency war; with every passing day, the headlines paint a convincing portrait of an emerging cold war between China and the West. But is this surface level reality the whole picture, or is there a deeper level to this conflict? Is China an opponent to the New World Order global governmental system or a witting collaborator with it? Join us in this in-depth edition of The Corbett Report podcast as we explore China’s position in the New World Order.

For those with limited bandwidth, CLICK HERE to download a smaller, lower file size version of this episode.

For those interested in audio quality, CLICK HERE for the highest-quality version of this episode (WARNING: very large download).

Documentation

‘This Week’ Cyber Spying Alert
Time Reference: 01:45
China slams hacking charges
Time Reference: 02:03
US accuses China of “destabilising’ acts in South China Sea
Time Reference: 02:14
China censures Japan PM, US defense secy. for “provocative” speeches
Time Reference: 02:41
U.S. Criticizes China for Lack of `Flexibility’ of Yuan
Time Reference: 02:56
Australian PM Announces Direct Yuan-Australian Dollar Trading
Time Reference: 03:17
‘Aggressive’ Chinese fighter jet flies dangerously close to U.S. Navy plane: Video
Time Reference: 03:56
Two US B-52 bombers enter China’s ADIZ
Time Reference: 04:08
De Rothschild Says China’s Growth a `Remarkable’ Story
Time Reference: 05:09
Rockefeller Family in China: Then and Now
Time Reference: 05:39
Soros: China Must Be Part Of The New World Order
Time Reference: 06:02
Henry Kissinger on China and the New World Order
Time Reference: 06:51
Zbigniew Brzezinski on China
Time Reference: 07:30
Rothkopf’s “Superclass”
Time Reference: 08:34
Stan Monteith Interviews Antony Sutton
Time Reference: 11:04
Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution – Antony Sutton
Time Reference: 12:59
Yale Daily News no. 96 February 29 1972
Time Reference: 18:59
Bush’s China Policy: Skull And Bones
Time Reference: 21:03
Mao’s Great Famine: the History of China’s Most Devastating Catastrophe (1958-62)
Time Reference: 24:48
Rockefeller: From A China Traveler (1973)
Time Reference: 26:55
Rockefeller and Kissinger
Time Reference: 29:07
Towards Capitalist Restoration?: Chinese Socialism after Mao
Time Reference: 31:43
Heirs of Mao’s Comrades Rise as New Capitalist Nobility
Time Reference: 33:48
Bloomberg Exposes Network of 8 Political Families
Time Reference: 35:22
The death of China’s “red capitalist” and the 1949 revolution
Time Reference: 38:52
CSIS Special Book Discussion: “On China,” with Henry Kissinger
Time Reference: 42:56

Episode 240 – Power Corporation Exposed
Time Reference: 46:00
Fortune 500, important engine driving Beijing CBD economic development
Time Reference: 46:46
The Great Decoupling: How the West is Engineering its Own Downfall
Time Reference: 49:56
Drivers of Foreign Investment in China and the New R&D Models
Time Reference: 51:46
U.S. Commercial Technology Transfers to the People’s Republic of China
Time Reference: 56:38
Chinese Missile Allegations: Key Stories
Time Reference: 1:00:10
China: Possible Missile Technology Transfers from U.S. Satellite Export Policy – Actions and Chronology
Time Reference: 1:00:25
US: Bush’s Brother Has Contract to Help Chinese Chip Maker
Time Reference: 1:00:37
Neil Bush Communist Photo Makes A Scene On Chinese Social Media Site Weibo
Time Reference: 1:01:01
The people with the endless bios: An introduction to the world we live in
Time Reference: 1:05:55
US-China Business Council
Time Reference: 1:06:16
USCBC Honors Kissinger at 40th Anniversary Celebration
Time Reference: 1:06:47
People’s Bank of China – BIS Research Conference
Time Reference: 1:07:35
Add yuan to IMF currency basket
Time Reference: 1:07:50
Will the 21st Century Belong to China?
Time Reference: 1:08:28
Applying to join the Chinese Communist Party – music video
Time Reference: 1:11:15

.
RELATED:
https://ronmamita.wordpress.com/2014/07/24/the-dollars-70-year-dominance-is-coming-to-an-end/
https://ronmamita.wordpress.com/2014/11/10/fueled-by-central-banks-easy-money-the-global-economy-is-racing-to-the-cliff/
https://ronmamita.wordpress.com/2013/05/20/tpp-ttip-and-rcep/
https://ronmamita.wordpress.com/2013/10/05/are-any-of-your-thoughts-in-this-matrix/
https://ronmamita.wordpress.com/2013/10/19/institutional-watch-financial-control-tug-o-war/
https://ronmamita.wordpress.com/2013/11/13/the-tpp-is-by-far-the-largest-and-most-oppressive-economic-treaty-devised-thus-far/
https://ronmamita.wordpress.com/2014/10/08/global-corporatocracy/
https://ronmamita.wordpress.com/2013/05/07/people-you-should-know/
https://ronmamita.wordpress.com/2014/03/07/beware-economic-currency-reset-requires-emergency/
https://ronmamita.wordpress.com/2014/10/15/puzzle-pieces-monetary-reset-plan/
_________________________________________________________

About

Want Worldwide PEACE and Prosperity. We are the solution we have been searching for... Free People of Earth will solve our crisis and create an era of Creativity. Be at Peace; Be Aware; Be Creative; Be Active; Be Free and Alive; and then Share it. LOVE & Peace AMOR y Paz

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Freedom-Expressed
2 comments on “China and the NWO
  1. RonMamita says:

    First direct China-Spain freight train arrives in Madrid
    by Staff Writers
    Madrid (AFP) Dec 09, 2014

    The first freight train to link China directly to Spain arrived in Madrid on Tuesday after covering over 13,000 kilometres (8,000 miles) in a test run of a planned regular service between the two nations.

    The train departed Yiwu in eastern China, a major wholesale centre for small consumer goods, on November 18 and passed through Kazakhstan, Russia, Belarus, Poland, Germany, and France during its 21-day trip.

    The newly operational route is the longest railway route in the world, longer still than Russia’s famous Transsiberian railway linking Moscow to Vladivostok near Russia’s border with China.

    The journey time was over ten days shorter than if the goods transported by the train had been shipped by sea, Spain’s public works ministry said.

    The train’s 40 shipping containers transported goods made in Zhejiang province, including spinning tops for children and cutting tools. The train will return to China with wine, olive oil and cured ham.

    Speaking a ceremony in Madrid, Li Qiang, the governor of China’s Zhejiang province where Yiwu is located, said the route was important to “implement the strategy of developing a new ‘silk road'”.

    China has a regular direct freight train service to Germany, Europe’s largest economy.

    One route links the Chinese megacity of Chongqing to Duisburg, a steel-making town and one of Germany’s most-important transportation and commercial hubs.

    The other route links Beijing, the Chinese capital, to Hamburg, Germany’s second-largest city.

    The plan is to create a similar regular route between China and Spain, Spanish Public Works Minister Ana Pastor told reporters after the train arrived at a logistical centre near Madrid’s main railway station.

    The Spanish capital already is “a European and international distribution hub” with good links to both Africa and Latin America, she said.

    Euro Cargo Rail, a subsidiary of German freight operator DB Shenker Rail, is studying the possibility of starting a regular service between China and Spain during the first half of next year with two monthly trips.

    Roughly 80 percent of global trade is shipped by boat as freight train service faces several technical and bureaucratic hurdles which vary according to country.

    The goods on the train which arrived in Madrid for example had to be transferred to different wagons at three points during the trip because of incompatible track gauges in different countries.

    But rail transport is less expensive, more environmentally friendly and faster than maritime shipping, according to DB Shenker Rail.

    China is the European Union’s biggest source of imports, according to the European Commission.

  2. RonMamita says:

    BAP Panel Raises the Stakes Against Deutsch et al — Secured Status May be Challenged

    Fur Further Information please call 954-495-9867 or 520-405-1688

    ——————————–

    ALERT FOR BANKRUPTCY LAWYERS — SECURED STATUS OF ALLEGED CREDITOR IS NOT TO BE ASSUMED

    ——————————–

    I have long held and advocated three points:

    1. The filing of false claims in the nonjudicial process of a majority of states should not result in success where the same false claims could never be proven in judicial process. Nonjudicial process was meant as an administrative remedy to foreclosures that were NOT in dispute. Any application of nonjudicial schemes that allows false claims to succeed where they would fail in a judicial action is unconstitutional.
    2. The filing of a bankruptcy petition that shows property to be encumbered by virtue of a deed of trust is admitting a false representation made by a stranger to the transaction. The petition for bankruptcy relief should be filed showing that the property is not encumbered and the adversary or collateral proceeding to nullify the mortgage and the note should accompany each filing where the note and mortgage are subject to claims of securitization or a “new” beneficiary.
    3. The vast majority of decisions against borrowers result from voluntary or involuntary waiver, ignorance and failure to plead or object on the basis of false claims based on false documentation. The issue is not the signature (although that probably is false too); rather it is (a) the actual transaction which is missing and the (b) false documentation of a (i) fictitious transaction and (ii) fictitious transfers of fictitious (and non-fictitious) transactions. The result is often that the homeowner has admitted to the false assertion of being a borrower in relation to the party making the claim, admitting the secured status of the “creditor”, admitting that they are a creditor, admitting that they received a loan from within the chain claimed by the “creditor”, admitting the default, admitting the validity of the note and admitting the validity of the mortgage or deed of trust — thus leaving both the trial and appellate courts with no choice but to rule against the homeowner. Thus procedurally a false claim becomes “true” for purposes of that case.

    see 11/24/14 Decision: MEMORANDUM-_-ANTON-ANDREW-RIVERA-DENISE-ANN-RIVERA-Appellants-v.-DEUTSCHE-BANK-NATIONAL-TRUST-COMPANY-Trustee-of-Certificate-Holders-of-the-WAMU-Mortgage-Pass-Through-Certificate-Series-2005-AR6

    This decision is breath-taking. What the Panel has done here is fire a warning shot over the bow of the California Supreme Court with respect to the APPLICATION of the non-judicial process. AND it takes dead aim at those who make false claims on false debts in both nonjudicial and judicial process. Amongst the insiders it is well known that your chances on appeal to the BAP are less than 15% whereas an appeal to the District Judge, often ignored as an option, has at least a 50% prospect for success.

    So the fact that this decision comes from the BAP Panel which normally rubber stamps decisions of bankruptcy judges is all the more compelling. One word of caution that is not discussed here is the the matter of jurisdiction. I am not so sure the bankruptcy judge had jurisdiction to consider the matters raised in the adversary proceeding. I think there is a possibility that jurisdiction would be present before the District Court Judge, but not the Bankruptcy Judge.

    From one of my anonymous sources within a significant government agency I received the following:

    This case is going to be a cornucopia of decision material for BK courts nationwide (and others), it directly tackles all the issues regarding standing and assignment (But based on Non-J foreclosure, and this is California of course……) it tackles Glaski and Glaski loses, BUT notes dichotomy on secured creditor status….this case could have been even more , but leave to amend was forfeited by borrower inaction—– it is part huge win, part huge loss as it relates to Glaski, BUT IT IS DIRECTLY APPLICABLE TO CHASE/WAMU CASES……….Note in full case how court refers to transfer of “some of WAMU’s assets”, tacitly inferring that the court WILL NOT second guess what was and was not transferred………… i.e, foreclosing party needs to prove this!!

    AFFIRMED- NO SECURED PARTY STATUS FOR BK PROVEN

    Even though Siliga, Jenkins and Debrunner may preclude the

    Riveras from attacking DBNTC’s foreclosure proceedings by arguing

    that Chase’s assignment of the deed of trust was a nullity in

    light of the absence of a valid transfer of the underlying debt,

    we know of no law precluding the Riveras from challenging DBNTC’s assertion of secured status for purposes of the Riveras’ bankruptcy case. Nor did the bankruptcy court cite to any such law.

    We acknowledge that our analysis promotes the existence of two different sets of legal standards – one applicable in nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings and a markedly different one for use in ascertaining creditors’ rights in bankruptcy cases.

    But we did not create these divergent standards. The California legislature and the California courts did. We are not the first to point out the divergence of these standards. See CAL. REAL EST., at § 10:41 (noting that the requirements under California law for an effective assignment of a real-estate-secured obligation may differ depending on whether or not the dispute over the assignment arises in a challenge to nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings).
    We must accept the truth of the Riveras’ well-pled
    allegations indicating that the Hutchinson endorsement on the
    note was a sham and, more generally, that neither DBNTC nor Chase
    ever obtained any valid interest in the Riveras’ note or the loan
    repayment rights evidenced by that note. We also must
    acknowledge that at least part of the Riveras’ adversary
    proceeding was devoted to challenging DBNTC’s standing to file
    its proof of claim and to challenging DBNTC’s assertion of
    secured status for purposes of the Riveras’ bankruptcy case. As
    a result of these allegations and acknowledgments, we cannot
    reconcile our legal analysis, set forth above, with the
    bankruptcy court’s rulings on the Riveras’ second amended
    complaint. The bankruptcy court did not distinguish between the
    Riveras’ claims for relief that at least in part implicated the
    parties’ respective rights in the Riveras’ bankruptcy case from
    those claims for relief that only implicated the parties’
    respective rights in DBNTC’s nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings.

    THEY REJECT GLASKI-

    Here, we note that the California Supreme Court recently

    granted review from an intermediate appellate court decision
    following Jenkins and rejecting Glaski. Yvanova v. New Century
    Mortg. Corp., 226 Cal.App.4th 495 (2014), review granted &
    opinion de-published, 331 P.3d 1275 (Cal. Aug 27, 2014). Thus,
    we eventually will learn how the California Supreme Court views
    this issue. Even so, we are tasked with deciding the case before
    us, and Ninth Circuit precedent suggests that we should decide
    the case now, based on our prediction, rather than wait for the
    California Supreme Court to rule. See Hemmings, 285 F.3d at
    1203; Lewis v. Telephone Employees Credit Union, 87 F.3d 1537,
    1545 (9th Cir. 1996). Because we have no convincing reason to
    doubt that the California Supreme Court will follow the weight of
    authority among California’s intermediate appellate courts, we
    will follow them as well and hold that the Riveras lack standing
    to challenge the assignment of their deed of trust based on an
    alleged violation of a pooling and servicing agreement to which
    they were not a party.

    BUT……… THEY DO SUCCEED ON SECURED STATUS

    Even though the Riveras’ first claim for relief principally

    relies on their allegations regarding the assignment’s violation
    of the pooling and servicing agreement, their first claim for
    relief also explicitly incorporates their allegations challenging
    DBNTC’s proof of claim and disputing the validity of the
    Hutchinson endorsement. Those allegations, when combined with
    what is set forth in the first claim for relief, are sufficient
    on their face to state a claim that DBNTC does not hold a valid
    lien against the Riveras’ property because the underlying debt
    never was validly transferred to DBNTC. See In re Leisure Time
    Sports, Inc., 194 B.R. at 861 (citing Kelly v. Upshaw, 39 Cal.2d
    179 (1952) and stating that “a purported assignment of a mortgage
    without an assignment of the debt which it secured was a legal
    nullity.”).
    While the Riveras cannot pursue their first claim for relief
    for purposes of directly challenging DBNTC’s pending nonjudicial
    foreclosure proceedings, Debrunner, 204 Cal.App.4th at 440-42,
    the first claim for relief states a cognizable legal theory to
    the extent it is aimed at determining DBNTC’s rights, if any, as
    a creditor who has filed a proof of secured claim in the Riveras’
    bankruptcy case.

    TILA CLAIM UPHELD!—–

    Fifth Claim for Relief – for violation of the Federal Truth In Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1641(g)

    The Riveras’ TILA Claim alleged, quite simply, that they did
    not receive from DBNTC, at the time of Chase’s assignment of the
    deed of trust to DBNTC, the notice of change of ownership
    required by 15 U.S.C. § 1641(g)(1). That section provides:
    In addition to other disclosures required by this
    subchapter, not later than 30 days after the date on
    which a mortgage loan is sold or otherwise transferred
    or assigned to a third party, the creditor that is the
    new owner or assignee of the debt shall notify the
    borrower in writing of such transfer, including–

    (A) the identity, address, telephone number of the new

    creditor;

    (B) the date of transfer;

     

    (C) how to reach an agent or party having authority to

    act on behalf of the new creditor;

    (D) the location of the place where transfer of

    ownership of the debt is recorded; and

    (E) any other relevant information regarding the new

    creditor.

    The bankruptcy court did not explain why it considered this claim as lacking in merit. It refers to the fact that the
    Riveras had actual knowledge of the change in ownership within
    months of the recordation of the trust deed assignment. But the
    bankruptcy court did not explain how or why this actual knowledge
    would excuse noncompliance with the requirements of the statute.
    Generally, the consumer protections contained in the statute
    are liberally interpreted, and creditors must strictly comply
    with TILA’s requirements. See McDonald v. Checks–N–Advance, Inc.
    (In re Ferrell), 539 F.3d 1186, 1189 (9th Cir. 2008). On its
    face, 15 U.S.C. § 1640(a)(2)(A)(iv) imposes upon the assignee of
    a deed of trust who violates 15 U.S.C. § 1641(g)(1) statutory
    damages of “not less than $400 or greater than $4,000.”
    While the Riveras’ TILA claim did not state a plausible
    claim for actual damages, it did state a plausible claim for
    statutory damages. Consequently, the bankruptcy court erred when
    it dismissed the Riveras’ TILA claim.

    LAST, THEY GOT REAR ENDED FOR NOT SEEKING LEAVE TO AMEND

    Here, however, the Riveras did not argue in either the bankruptcy court or in their opening appeal brief that the court should have granted them leave to amend. Having not raised the issue in either place, we may consider it forfeited. See Golden v. Chicago Title Ins. Co. (In re Choo), 273 B.R. 608, 613 (9th Cir. BAP 2002).

    Even if we were to consider the issue, we note that the

    bankruptcy court gave the Riveras two chances to amend their
    complaint to state viable claims for relief, examined the claims
    they presented on three occasions and found them legally
    deficient each time. Moreover, the Riveras have not provided us
    with all of the record materials that would have permitted us a
    full view of the analyses and explanations the bankruptcy court
    offered them when it reviewed the Riveras’ original complaint and
    their first amended complaint. Under these circumstances, we
    will not second-guess the bankruptcy court’s decision to deny
    leave to amend. See generally In re Nordeen, 495 B.R. at 489-90
    (examining multiple opportunities given to the plaintiffs to
    amend their complaint and the bankruptcy court’s efforts to
    explain to them the deficiencies in their claims, and ultimately
    determining that the court did not abuse its discretion in
    denying the plaintiffs leave to amend their second amended
    complaint).

Please Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 280 other followers

The Worldwide Wave of Action
Peaceful Global TransitionApril 4th, 2014
Exercise freedom and creativity for all Earth’s inhabitants to explore ready breakthroughs in Self Organizing Communities, economics, and technology. This is a D.I.Y. project
State Sponsored Terror
The Big Day ReportFebruary 2nd, 2014
Institutions of crime Big days have come and gone (government Elections, and Tax filing). Search for what is hidden and for what is not spoken. Be Aware of the next big Day for fraudulent institutions.
RonMamita
Peace Today

Peace Today

RonMamita’s Blog
November 2014
S M T W T F S
« Oct   Dec »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  
All posts here
Whole-Community
Audio coming soon!
%d bloggers like this: