This is part of the globalists’ “Agenda 2030”, “Sustainable Development”, World police, World court, “Agenda 21”, managed by technocrats.
Google, Youtube, and Facebook ( along with Mainstream Media), appears to be on the front lines and may be among the first to start attacking your rights and entrepreneurship.
Alternative & Social Media are under increased attack.
It was already bad, but it is getting worse…
Be not afraid, this is but only a transitory phase. The end of the old is the beginning of the new.
Institutional governance is at war with Freedom of the People.
Unplug the TV, radio, MSM News, and look within, become a problem solver and use discernment.
Facing the Truth is a important step forward, sadly this simple action is beyond some individuals’ ability because their false beliefs are too precious.
Do what you can and do it to the best of your ability.
22 World Cities Join World Police Force
“With no public input, no Congress debate or vote, it will be blue helmets and not local cops who will be policing the streets of America” –http://canadafreepress.com/article/75782
According to the StrongCitiesNetwork.org website, the cities are New York, London, Beirut, Aarhus, Atlanta, Rotterdam, Victoria, Stockholm, Copenhagen, Kano, Montreal, Palermo, Mumbai, Denver, Mombasa, Paris, Dakar, Tunis, Medellin, Anatalya, Minneapolis, Oslo, and Puno.
Loretta Lynch announces to the UN the formation of ‘The Strong Cities Network’. This is a global police state that will include major International cities plus many large US cities.
She announced this is to fight ‘homegrown terrorism’. What is that?
The world police state is underway. More cities are expected to add their police forces to the world police. Right now the major Illuminati cities are all aboard including New York City, Atlanta, Denver, Minneapolis, Paris, London, Montreal, Beirut, Oslo and thirteen others.
Many smaller cities will soon find out that they were bribed by the federal government to agree to join this type of evil world group when they took free militarized equipment in return for their legally signed fealty.
Lynch said future threats will be met by a ‘global response’. What does that mean???
Cindy, in the above video, share important information about “World Parliament” :
A CONSTITUTION FOR THE FEDERATION OF EARTH:
Anthony Behar-Pool/Getty Images
Obama Administration and UN Announce Global Police Force to Fight ‘Extremism’ In U.S.
2 Oct 2015 breitbart.com
On Wednesday, Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced at the United Nations that her office would be working in several American cities to form what she called the Strong Cities Network (SCN), a law enforcement initiative that would encompass the globe.
This amounts to nothing less than the overriding of American laws, up to and including the United States Constitution, in favor of United Nations laws that would henceforth be implemented in the United States itself – without any consultation of Congress at all.
The United Nations is a sharia-compliant world body, and Obama, speaking there just days ago, insisted that “violent extremism” is not exclusive to Islam (which it is). Obama is redefining jihad terror to include everyone but the jihadists. So will the UN, driven largely by the sharia-enforcing Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and the pro-Islamic post-American President Obama, use a “global police force” to crush counter-jihad forces?
After all, with Obama knowingly aiding al-Qaeda forces in Syria, how likely is it that he will use his “global police force” against actual Islamic jihadists? I suspect that instead, this global police force will be used to impose the blasphemy laws under the sharia (Islamic law), and to silence all criticism of Islam for the President who proclaimed that “the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”
What is a global police force doing in our cities? This is exactly the abdication of American sovereignty that I warned about in my book, The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America. The Obama Department of Justice made it clear that it was exactly that when it distributed a press release last week announcing the “Launch of Strong Cities Network to Strengthen Community Resilience Against Violent Extremism.” In that press release, the DoJ complained that “while many cities and local authorities are developing innovative responses to address this challenge, no systematic efforts are in place to share experiences, pool resources and build a community of cities to inspire local action on a global scale.”
So if the local and municipal effort to counter the euphemistic and disingenuous “violent extremism” is inadequate and hasn’t developed “systematic efforts are in place to share experiences, pool resources and build a community of cities to inspire local action on a global scale,” the feds – and the UN – have to step in. Thus the groundwork is being laid for federal and international interference down to the local level. “The Strong Cities Network,” Lynch declared, “will serve as a vital tool to strengthen capacity-building and improve collaboration” – i.e., local dependence on federal and international authorities.
Lynch made the global (that is, United Nations) involvement clear when she added: “As we continue to counter a range of domestic and global terror threats, this innovative platform will enable cities to learn from one another, to develop best practices and to build social cohesion and community resilience here at home and around the world.”
This internationalist character was brought to the fore by the fact that the Strong Cities Network was launched on September 29 not at the White House or the Department of Homeland Security, or at the FBI headquarters or anywhere else that might be fitting for a national project, but at the United Nations.
Even more ominously, the DoJ press release says that the Strong Cities Network “will strengthen strategic planning and practices to address violent extremism in all its forms by fostering collaboration among cities, municipalities and other sub-national authorities.” Sub-national and international: the press release then quotes Governing Mayor Stian Berger Røsland of Oslo, Norway, a participant in the Strong Cities Network, saying: “To counter violent extremism we need determined action at all levels of governance. To succeed, we must coordinate our efforts and cooperate across borders. The Strong Cities Network will enable cities across the globe pool our resources, knowledge and best practices together and thus leave us standing stronger in the fight against one of the greatest threats to modern society.” …Read full report
Video posted 05 Oct 2015
One particularly controversial part of the provisions make it a crime to reveal corporate wrongdoing “through a computer system”. Experts have pointed out that the wording is very vague, and could lead to whistleblowers being penalised for sharing important information, and lead to journalists stopping reporting on them.
Others require that online content providers — such as YouTube and Facebook — must take down content if they receive just one complaint, as they are in the US. That will be harmful for startups looking to build such businesses since they’ll be required to have the resources to respond to every complaint, experts have pointed out.
In 2013, when the partnership was still being discussed, the Electronic Freedom Foundation called TPP “one of the worst global threats to the internet”. The changes are dangerous because to unify the various countries in the partnerships’ rules on intellectual property and other internet law, they are opting to take the US’s largely very restrictive rules.
UN Rolls Out Agenda 2030 “Global(ist) Goals”