A new record: Major publisher retracting more than 100 studies from cancer journal over fake peer reviews
In 2015, Springer retracted 64 papers for compromised reviews from 10 journals, including Tumor Biology. With this latest batch of retractions, the total number of papers retracted for fake reviews is now around 450.
“Today’s scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.” -Nikola Tesla
“The agency has yet to identify any legal basis for withholding these documents,” he said, adding that his panel would use “all tools at its disposal” to continue investigating.
Jeff interviews truth seeker Jeran from Jeranism, lifting the lid on the true nature of NASA and much more, topics include:
moon landing fakery, NASA’s relationship with government, images from space obvious fakes, scientism, NASA scientists dying mysteriously including climate change deniers, astronauts, and natural health doctors, mass shooting hoaxes…
“A lot of what is published is incorrect.”
I’m not allowed to say who made this remark because we were asked to observe Chatham House rules. We were also asked not to take photographs of slides.
Those who worked for government agencies pleaded that their comments especially remain unquoted, since the forthcoming UK election meant they were living in “purdah”—a chilling state where severe restrictions on freedom of speech are placed on anyone on the government’s payroll. Why the paranoid concern for secrecy and non-attribution?
Major publisher retracts 43 scientific papers amid wider fake peer-review scandal!
the whole peer-review system has [become unreliable] in recent years for a host of flaws and irregularities, ranging from lackadaisical reviewing to … outright fraud.
Peace Today
Ronmamita's Blog 