WOW, that is a MAJOR HEADLINE!
I have been expecting and searching for it to come out of the major news outlets, never the less I am startled to finally see it. Please share this report from PRESSTV.ir ~Ron
The USS San Antonio departs Naval Station Norfolk in Norfolk, Virginia on October 31, 2012.
US revealed as enemy of world
by Finian Cunningham
“The United States of America stands exposed in the eyes of the entire world as the number-one terrorist threat to the future of humanity. Many have known this fact already, but now it is universally clear.
[…]
The people of the world have had it with elite Western rulers acting as terrorists who are holding humanity to ransom. The rulers are presiding not only over military terrorism. They are inflicting economic, social and ecological terrorism with their bankrupt capitalist smash-and-grab system. That system has reached the point of meltdown and that is why we are being pushed into relentless wars – in order for the rulers and their politician puppets to corner the remaining resources. The ultimate solution to end the wars is for the people to overthrow the economic system that US and Western elite rulers preside over. The insane criminality of the US rulers over Syria is exposing this historic challenge facing humanity.
After the British parliamentary setback the US Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel said: “Our approach is to continue to find an international coalition that will act together. It is the goal of President Obama and our government… whatever decision is taken, that it be an international collaboration and effort.”
Can you believe how ridiculous these American puppets sound? What the deluded Americans do not seem to realize is that they are on their own. The only entities willing to support their aggression on Syria is Saudi Arabia and Israel. So, how’s that for credibility? The only support Washington can muster is from a feudal, sword-wielding, head-chopping regime and a criminal pariah genocidal state. Coalition of the Willing? More like Coalition of the Killing.”
SOURCE: PRESSTV
*RELATED:
*Last Updated: Sept. 4, 2013
___________________________________
Want Worldwide PEACE and Prosperity. We are the solution we have been searching for... Free People on Earth will solve our crisis and create an era of Creativity. Be Aware; Be Creative; Be Active; Be Free; and then Share it. LOVE & Wholeness AMOR y Paz
Ronmamita's Blog 
http://the-tap.blogspot.com/2013/09/zionists-try-to-trigger-war-in-east.html
Tuesday, September 03, 2013
Zionists try to trigger war in East Mediterranean
Exercise described as test of Israel Hetz anti-ballistic missile system jointly developed with US.
Israel has announced that it carried out a test of an anti-missile system, shortly after Russia announced that its defence systems detected the launch of two missiles from the central part of the Mediterranean Sea towards the eastern coastline.
The Israeli army said it was “not familiar” with any missiles being fired in the Mediterranean, while saying that the missile that was tested – an Arrow 2 BMD system – is part of the Israel Hetz anti-missile system, a joint US-Israeli project.
Israel Hetz is used for defence against ballistic-missile attacks while the Iron Dome system is for defence against low-altitude rocket attacks.
Israeli media reports said the missiles was directed from bases in the Mediterranean and in the centre of Israel at 9:15am (06:15 GMT), around the same time cited by Russian state-run news agency RIA.
The Russian Defence Ministry said in a statement quoted by RIA that the launches took place at 10:16am Moscow time (06:16 GMT) on Tuesday and were detected by an early-warning system in Armavir in southern Russia.
It said Sergei Shoigu, the Russian defence minister, had already reported to President Vladimir Putin about the event, which comes amid growing expectations of Western military action in Syria.
Al Jazeera’s Paul Brennan, reporting from Jerusalem on Tuesday, said the acknowledgement by Israel was unusual.
“Its is highly unusual that Israel should be involved in this joint exercise, as it could draw Israel into the conflict,” he said.
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2013/09/20139391217914513.html
LikeLike
http://the-tap.blogspot.com/2013/09/5-missile-equipped-us-destroyers-off.html
Tuesday, September 03, 2013
5 missile equipped US destroyers off Syrian coast cause panic
US and Allied Warships off the Syrian Coastline: Naval Deployment Was Decided “Before” the August 21 Chemical Weapons Attack
A massive US and allied naval deployment is occurring in the Red Sea, the Eastern Mediterranean and the Persian Gulf.
While this display of military might may not be part of an immediate attack plan on Syria, it is creating an atmosphere of fear and panic within Syria.
The US Navy has deployed the USS San Antonio, an amphibious transport ship to the Eastern Mediterranean. The San Antonio is joining five US destroyers which “are already in place for possible missile strikes on Syria, a defense official said Sunday.”
The USS San Antonio, with several helicopters and hundreds of Marines on board, is “on station in the Eastern Mediterranean” but “has received no specific tasking,” said the defense official, who spoke on condition of anonymity. US Navy deploys five warships, one amphibious ship to Mediterranean for Syria
While the USS San Antonio has amphibious landing equipment, which can be used to land some six thousand sailors and marines, “no boots on the ground”, however, remains the official motto.
So why then has the US deployed its most advanced amphibious landing ship? The reports suggest that this is routine and there are no attack plans:
“No amphibious landing is in the works, however, as President Barack Obama has ruled out any “boots on the ground” (Ibid)
USS San Antonio
There are currently five destroyers off the coast of Syria, the USS Stout, Mahan, Ramage, Barry and Graveley, not to mention the San Antonio amphibious landing vessel.
The destroyers are equipped with Tomahawk cruise missiles which “are ready to fire … if Obama gives the order.”
On 28 August the U.S. Navy announced the deployment of the Arleigh Burke-class destroyer USS Stout en route to join four other destroyers “amid allegations that the regime of Syrian president Bashar al-Assad used chemical weapons against civilians on August 21″.
In a not unusual twist, this deployment of US and allied naval forces preceded the chemical weapons attack which is being blamed on president Bashar al Assad.
According to Naval records, the guided missile destroyer USS Stout (DDG 55) departed Naval Station Norfolk, Va. on August 18, 2013, “for deployment to the U.S. 6th Fleet area of responsibility” (see image below upon its departure in Norfolk on August 18).
The USS Ramage destroyer left Naval Station Norfolk on August 13 for the Eastern Mediterranean, “to relieve the Mahan”.
Yet in fact what was decided was to deploy all five destroyers along the Syrian coastline well in advance of the chemical attacks of August 21, which constitute Obama’s pretext to intervene on humanitarian grounds.
The amphibious transport dock San Antonio, carrying elements of the 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit, has joined the five Navy destroyers in the eastern Mediterranean Sea, a defense official confirmed [August 30].
“No specific tasking has been received at this point,” the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. “The San Antonio is being kept in the sea as a prudent decision should ship capabilities be required.”
The five destroyers positioned near Syria are the: Barry, Gravely, Mahan, Ramage and Stout.
The Navy had been operating with three destroyers in the Med, and the Ramage and Stout were expected to replace Mahan and Gravely, respectively, when they arrived there this month. But officials decided to keep all five in place as the U.S. weighs an attack. Each destroyer is capable of carrying up to 90 Tomahawk cruise missiles, although they usually have fewer on hand during deployment. marinecorpstimes.com, August 30, 2013
This massive naval deployment was ordered prior to the tragic event of August 21, which begs the question:
If the chemical weapons attack is a justification for intervening, why was the order to launch an R2P “humanitarian” naval operation against Syria decided upon “Prior” to August 21?
Was there advanced knowledge or intelligence regarding the timing and occurrence of the 21 August Chemical Weapons attack?
http://www.globalresearch.ca/massive-naval-deployment-us-and-allied-warships-deployed-to-syrian-coastline-before-the-august-21-chemical-weapons-attack/5347766?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=massive-naval-deployment-us-and-allied-warships-deployed-to-syrian-coastline-before-the-august-21-chemical-weapons-attack
LikeLike
SYRIA: False Flag Alert 9/11 Assad’s Birthday
In today’s video, Dahboo77 of AMTV explains how a Sept 11 false flag attack could be in the works on the same day as Assad’s birthday.
http://www.amtvmedia.com/
http://www.greenewave.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/DAHBOO77
LikeLike
Allied Forces Prepared For Attack – HELLWARS WWIII Update
Published on Sep 2, 2013
WORLD WAR 3 ALLIED FORCES PREPARED 4 ATTACK
The WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION of ALLIED FORCES now headed for a showdown with Syria and its allies that include Russia, China, and Iran.
.
Syria’s “Chemical Weapons” Turn Out to be Fluoride!
LikeLike
The Syrian War What You’re Not Being Told
Published on Sep 3, 2013
What’s really going on in Syria? Let’s look at the evidence
LikeLike
Lies and Half Truths Leading to Another Bloodbath
.
Syrian “Debate” Lie
LikeLike
Is the recent Navy yard shooting event the excuse that will be used in an attempt to justify the reasoning to forcefully take personal arms and private property away from the people?
If so, will it spark violence and armed rebellion?
I do not have the answers to these questions, but here is what President Obama is reported (by CBS and Reuters) to have decided:
“In the wake of the shooting at the Navy Yard, Obama spokesman Jay Carney said the president is implementing executive actions and reiterated his commitment to strengthening gun laws, including expanding background checks to sales online and at gun shows.” – http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/09/17/carney-obama-implementing-executive-actions-following-navy-yard-shooting/
Sounds reasonable, but the details will be revealed when the People learn what executive decisions are being made and how they will be implemented/enforced…
What Jay Carney (spokesman) says may or may not be true; what matters is by what “authority” has a President to implement “executive actions” on the People without the consent of the People, or in violation of the U.S. Constitution?
LikeLike