Sadly, Mueller’s crooked FBI investigation is a heavy American tax burden.
I wish to thank the Gateway Pundit news-blog for sharing this laugh at Mueller’s Special Counsel expense.
After reading this, I encourage you to read their full report:
“Rogue DOJ Adds Four More Leftist Attorneys to Mueller Team in Last Ditch Attempt to Save Phony Russian Bot Case“.
The defence attorneys representing the Russian Bots that the FBI falsely claim, illegally influenced the 2016 U.S. Elections against the front runner Hillary Clinton, are destroying Mueller’s “Unlawfully Appointed Special Counsel” in court.
WOW, the most awesome defence statement against Mueller’s Special Counsel thus far!!!
Last weekend the Concord Management team filed a motion against the Mueller team’s protective order request to conceal all data related to their case. The Concord team states in their motion filed June 14th:
Having produced not one iota of discovery in this criminal case the unlawfully appointed Special Counsel requests a special and unprecedented blanket protective order covering tens of millions of pages of unclassified discovery.
Having made this special request based on a secret submission to the Court and a hysterical dithyramb about the future of the American elections, one would think that the Special Counsel would cite to case holdings that support this remarkable request.
But no, instead, the Special Counsel seeks to equate this make-believe electioneering case to others involving international terrorism and major drug trafficking, and relies only on irrelevant dicta from inappropriate, primarily out-of-circuit cases.
In short, fake law, which is much more dangerous than fake news.
Concord Management’s lawyer’s previously said Mueller indicted “the proverbial ham sandwich.” The reason the Concord Management attorneys called the case a ‘proverbial ham sandwich’ was because one of the entities indicted by the Mueller team, Concord Catering, was not in existence at the time the crimes were alleged to have taken place.
Some more laughs, attorneys, please don’t take this seriously.
Why don’t snakes bite attorneys?
How many lawyers does it take to screw in a light bulb?
How many can you afford?
How can you tell the difference between an attorney lying dead in the road and a coyote lying dead in the road?
With the coyote, you usually see skid marks.
What’s the difference between a lawyer and an onion?
You cry when you cut up an onion.
Good News: A busload of lawyers ran off a cliff. The bus was destroyed and there were no survivors.
Bad News: There were three empty seats.
An engineer, a physicist, and a lawyer were being interviewed for a position as chief executive officer of a large corporation.
The engineer was interviewed first, and was asked a long list of questions, ending with “How much is two plus two?” The engineer excused himself, and made a series of measurements and calculations before returning to the board room and announcing, “Four.”
The physicist was next interviewed, and was asked the same questions. Before answering the last question, he excused himself, made for the library, and did a great deal of research. After a consultation with the United States Bureau of Standards and many calculations, he also announced “Four.”
The lawyer was interviewed last, and was asked the same questions.
At the end of his interview, before answering the last question, he drew all the shades in the room, looked outside the door to see if anyone was there, checked the telephone for listening devices, and asked “How much do you want it to be?”