Research America’s Abolitionist Archives and you find many manuscripts and speeches explaining slavery was a national sin, and that it was the moral obligation of every American to eradicate it.
When you observe details of different speakers you find distinct differences of what to do, how to do it, and finally the different visions of what America will look like after slavery ends.
There were abolitionists of all color, ethnicity, and culture.
“Colored” and dark skinned People Lived In America Prior to the European colonization.
Some abolitionist thought the “negroid” slaves should be shipped to Africa – regardless if they were born in America or had children who were born in America, and regardless if they had never been to Africa and knew no one in Africa, nor if they spoke any indigenous African languages!
Bluntly stated, some abolitionists wanted to forcefully round up dark skinned People and ship them out of America against their free will, further endangering their safety and destroying family connections.
That policy would hardly be an act of embracing freedom by abolitionists.
The above preamble was to introduce the reader to a messy transition, demonstrating the complexity of confused, good, and bad intentioned people dealing with a major social crisis within a Legal institutional framework.
Perhaps outside of a institutional model most people would have done the right thing and welcomed them into their family and home, or assisted them in building houses nearby, assisting them in their free will choices as a good neighbor or friend…
Imagine today, citizens declaring their freedom and sovereignty.
Imagine what actions governments would take, and also imagine the various actions by different individuals defending their personal sovereignty…
Do you see the possibility of covert agents infiltrating activists, dissenting groups, and Natural Law advocates?
I witnessed the International Tribunal for Natural Justice (ITNJ) ceremonial seating on 15 June 2015.
I logged the symbolic subjugation and signs of worship in my notes.
I observed the people texting in the chatbox with mixed emotions of faithful hope, and distrustful suspicions, and I witnessed words of subordination spoken, such as: “your worshipness“, “my lord“, oath, treaty, I saw a man wearing a red robe, and another wearing a black robe with a white wig.
How can anyone supporting personal sovereignty and freedom for the People on Earth have an Oath to the Bar Association and take an opposing Oath without deception or misunderstanding?
Why would anyone supporting freedom for the People simultaneously serve two masters?
Bluntly speaking, the show was disturbing in that it was deceptive, it did not nurture a Peer to Peer community (P2P), and I did not sense that the People on Earth along with their children would be released from a hierarchical institutional system of control and neither taught self governance with personal sovereignty.
The ceremonial show would fit into what our earlier discussions have classified as playing “Let’s Pretend”.
I was unpleasantly surprised by what I saw, because whatever it claimed to be, the ITNJ was not a change into anything new for the People on Earth.
While this fits within my forecast of a messy transition, all is not hopelessly lost, I imagine the ITNJ members can change all that into something effective in supporting the People on Earth who claim their freedom, claim their personal sovereignty, who refuse to address anyone as “my lord“, or “your worshipness“, and determinedly states his/her noncompliance with the legal fiction of institutional governance and authority. I am convinced from my personal discussions with a few ITNJ members about loving visions for the advancement of the People on Earth that they would not tolerate deception and co-opting their efforts for planetary healing, self governance and freedom.
I imagine the ITNJ members can change all that into support and protection for peer to peer, and self organizing communities, however it appears that it will be a challenge for ITNJ members from what I witnessed.
ITNJ members may have to challenge their problem solving skills and face themselves, their assumptions, their titles and choice of words. For if they fail, then their descendants will not be aware of the nuanced distinctions faced today to remove subjugation, titles of nobility, and the institutional authority to rule over People who chose to be free.
I am reminded that a Liar by definition is a deceiver, however,
a skilled deceiver need not be a Liar.
Professional deceivers are paid to do it, as in careers in Public Relations, Marketing, and Advertising.
Some deceivers have successfully deceived even themselves by swallowing hook, line, and sinker the false stories sponsored by institutions, they grow up with false assumptions and false beliefs, and thus they are not aware they are deceiving anyone when they share what they were trained to believe.
Massive international boycotts, particularly all forms of taxation, and workers/students walkouts may be necessary.
Then real individual actions will move the officials and executives claiming institutional authority, privileges, and immunity that does not exist, to finally face the truth presented by the People.
Until effective mass boycotts occur with demands to cease and desist, expect officials and executives to continue doing what they are now doing.