Am I the first to categorize this century as the “Century of LOST TRUST“?
Perhaps, however this shift in consciousness and mass awakening is a “GOOD” thing.
…
Perhaps you have heard of a Chaplain named “Lindsey Williams” from his many audio recordings.
I will not insert a categorization of him, because they would be negative, however he does sell DVDs repeating what his anonymous “elite friends” tell him…
In Lindsey Williams’ most recent DVD being sold, he said:
Regarding the financial collapse, it did not happen as the elite expected. Lindsey believes it did not happen because of Divine action. This delay will result in a more severe financial reset when it does happen.
The internet is blazing with reports of distrust in institutions and their mass deceptions.
Many individuals distrust the mainstream mass media news, and viewership has declined sharply.
I see that as part of a worldwide Mass Awakening.
Individual investors are leaving Wall Street and the globalists’ Exchange Markets.
The Trillions of Dollars traded are mostly institutional investors with super-computer algorithms.
Pension and insurance funds have to earn interest…
What I see from past events is that the elite do not stop, for example:
After the failed attempt for the league of nations, another world war and voila!
The united nations is founded.
My guess is that the current elite-globalists will not abandon their plans, trade agreements, and treaties until they are removed and their institutions no longer function.
Below is some recent evidence of growing Distrust:
America has a problem with trust, and it’s getting worse
- Edward J. Waitzer: Many institutional long-term investors are often biased … This bias is exacerbated by a distrust of corporate boards and management, bred, …
Playing the long game | Financial Post. - “Wall Street bank stocks are plunging and the potential for a mega Wall Street bank to implode has risen dramatically from the shrinkage in the buffer of equity capital. Trillions of dollars more in derivatives exist today on bank balance sheets than were there in 2008 and the public has no clarity on whom the counterparties to this risk are. Investors are voting with their feet and stampeding out of all mega banks.”
Wall Street On Parade ¦ No One Wants to Be Fed Chair Janet Yellen This Week - Forty-six year old Anita Tarver echoes the feeling of distrust. “Politics is really hard, you just can’t trust it.”
Why Many Americans Trust No Major Institution to Improve Their - the new 2016 Edelman Global Trust Barometer, which for the past 15 years has measured people’s levels of trust in key institutions, including business. Those trust levels have declined over the years to the point where about half of those surveyed annually generally distrust business.
See: Trust in Boards: A Leading Indicator of Performance - Most of them have become deeply distrustful — distrustful of government, distrustful … After all, people discovered in the financial crisis that every major institution … aren’t trusted, you can’t sell products, hire people or attract or keep investors.
America has a problem with trust, and it’s getting worse – Chicagotribune …
.
RELATED:
CNBC Viewership Collapse Continues; Cramer, Kudlow Audience At Record Lows
More Evidence Surfaces: Criminals are Running The Federal Reserve
This Time The Most Embarrassing Thing To Say Will Be “No One Saw This Coming”
_____________________________________________
Want Worldwide PEACE and Prosperity. We are the solution we have been searching for... Free People on Earth will solve our crisis and create an era of Creativity. Be Aware; Be Creative; Be Active; Be Free; and then Share it. LOVE & Wholeness AMOR y Paz
Ronmamita's Blog 
Four of the Largest Wall Street Banks Hit 12-Month Lows Last Week
By Pam Martens and Russ Martens: February 7, 2016
Sanford (Sandy) Weill, the Man Who Put the Serially Charged Citigroup Behemoth Together
Last Wednesday something noteworthy happened on Wall Street. Four of the largest Wall Street banks, each holding trillions of dollars in derivatives, hit new 12-month lows in intraday trading. The banks are Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley. The banks recovered a little ground by the end of the week. These banks have two other things in common: they have been spending billions buying back their own stock and they all received bailouts during the 2008 crash.
Over the past six years, publicly traded companies in the Standard and Poor’s 500 Index have bought back $2.7 trillion of their own shares according to Bloomberg data. There are four major problems with this strategy: much of the buybacks are financed with debt; some of the buybacks simply offset insider selling or stock awards to executives; none of the money goes to growing or innovating the company; the timing of the buybacks could lead to stock market manipulation.
In the September 2014 issue of the Harvard Business Review, William Lazonick sized up the share buyback phenomenon like this:
“Given incentives to maximize shareholder value and meet Wall Street’s expectations for ever higher quarterly EPS, top executives turned to massive stock repurchases, which helped them ‘manage’ stock prices. The result: Trillions of dollars that could have been spent on innovation and job creation in the U.S. economy over the past three decades have instead been used to buy back shares for what is effectively stock-price manipulation.”
The SEC has a very lax rule, known as 10b-18, which provides a multitude of openings for stock price manipulation. As we previously reported, Wall Street banks can even carry out buybacks in their own dark pools as the self-regulators on Wall Street look the other way.
Lazonick says the U.S. has moved from a value creation model to a value extraction model. (Senator Bernie Sanders has an even more simplified analysis, stating that the business model of Wall Street is fraud.)
Lazonick writes:
“For three decades I’ve been studying how the resource allocation decisions of major U.S. corporations influence the relationship between value creation and value extraction, and how that relationship affects the U.S. economy. From the end of World War II until the late 1970s, a retain-and-reinvest approach to resource allocation prevailed at major U.S. corporations. They retained earnings and reinvested them in increasing their capabilities, first and foremost in the employees who helped make firms more competitive. They provided workers with higher incomes and greater job security, thus contributing to equitable, stable economic growth—what I call ‘sustainable prosperity.’
“This pattern began to break down in the late 1970s, giving way to a downsize-and-distribute regime of reducing costs and then distributing the freed-up cash to financial interests, particularly shareholders. By favoring value extraction over value creation, this approach has contributed to employment instability and income inequality.”
And don’t forget the extraction of wealth that comes from mismanaged, publicly traded companies being owned long-term in pension funds, IRAs and 401(k) plans. Citigroup, which engaged in massive buybacks before the 2008 crash and in recent quarters, has a share price that is more than 90 percent less than before the crisis.
At the close of trading on April 18, 2000, 100 shares of Citigroup were worth $6,212. Today, a decade and a half later, that 100 shares has shrunk to 13.33 shares with a value of $531.33 as of Friday’s close. (Citigroup did a 4 for 3 stock split on August 25, 2000 and a 1 for 10 reverse split on May 9, 2011.) In other words, your value as a shareholder has been decimated by 91.4 percent.
Contrast that performance with what insiders have extracted from the company: former Citigroup CEO Sandy Weill became a billionaire from his lavish stock awards; Co-CEO John Reed received an estimated $291 million from selling his shares when he stepped down in 2000; Robert Rubin, the former U.S. Treasury Secretary who sat on Citigroup’s Board after helping push through the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act (which allowed Citigroup to become a Frankenbank and require the largest taxpayer bailout in U.S. history), raked in more than $120 million from Citigroup over a decade. The current U.S. Treasury Secretary, Jack Lew, and current Vice Chairman of the Federal Reserve, Stanley Fischer, also received millions in compensation for stints at Citigroup before it collapsed into the arms of the U.S. taxpayer.
As Wall Street becomes an increasing focal point in this year’s race for the White House, these various institutionalized forms of looting corporations must become part of the national debate.
http://wallstreetonparade.com/2016/02/four-of-the-largest-wall-street-banks-hit-12-month-lows-last-week/
LikeLike
Manipulating Public Opinion May End Soon
*Science Crisis/Scandals
*Political Scandals
*Banking Fraud is Systemic
*Compulsory Educational System/Indoctrination
*Corporate Globalism/Commercial Law/Treaties/Trade Agreements
*Organized Religions
*Law Court Scandals
investigate more…
Title: The War On What You Believe
and more…
Title: ONE NATION UNDER GOD?
LikeLike
The Global Elite Do Not Stop
I discovered from research, their agenda lasts until it is achieved. I have read plans from over a century that are being achieved today.
With the creation of national currencies they fund their institutions and secret societies that maintain the objectives. Newly arriving professionals carry out those agendas (from population reduction to weather modification/geoengineering, to GMO/genetic manipulation, and on it goes…).
Don’t believe it?
Do your own research, investigate the Royal Society, CFR, Bilderberg group, Rockefeller foundation, Pilgrims club, Club of Rome, and others…
The script was written long ago, and it is still being followed.
Some know and some do not know they are following an ancient script.
But prestigious institutions keep their agenda moving forward with massive funds:
11 Feb 2016 Joseph Farrell speculates why Germany and France are calling for a Euro-Finance Ministry.
Joseph thinks this is a last ditch effort to centralize more control in Brussels against a rising tide of popular opposition in Europe to the “refugee” crisis.
However, I note the trend of rising opposition to the European Union as an institution of technocrats over the sovereignty of the People in Europe and the “Euro-zone”.
It is very popular to call for an exit from the E.U.!
Consider the Grexit, Brexit, and others…
*As I said above, the elite globalists do not stop.
They see a threat to their plan for a federal Europe that usurp the sovereignty of the nation states in European region, and they call for tighter control with the implementation of a Euro-Finance Ministry!
This is but only one recent example of many, where tighter control is being claimed during rising crises.
LikeLike
Overwhelming Majority of Americans Believe that Both Parties Are Too Corrupt to Change Anything … “This, In Fact, Is A Revolution”
Posted on February 8, 2016 by WashingtonsBlog
Why Americans Are Backing Trump and Sanders Over the Mainstream Candidates Backed By the Political Machines
We’ve previously noted that polls show that Americans are in a “pre-revolutionary” mood, that less than 1 in 5 Americans think that the government has the “consent of the governed”, that government corruption tops the list of Americans’ fears (gee, we wonder why), and that 3 times as many Americans supported King George during the Revolutionary War than support our OWN Congress today.
You might assume that such statements are over-the-top … or that the results come from partisan pollsters.
But a group of Republican and Democratic pollsters and political strategists reviewed polling data last week, and revealed some stunning results:
84% of all Americans believe political leaders are more interested in protecting their power and privilege than doing what is right
81% percent believe the power of ordinary people to control our country is getting weaker every day as politicians of both parties fight to protect their own power and privilege
80% believe the federal government is its own special interest primarily looking out for itself
79% of all voters believe we need to recruit and support more candidates for office, at all levels of government, who are ordinary citizens, rather than professional politicians and lawyers
78% believe that the Democratic and Republican Parties are essentially useless in changing anything, because both political parties are too beholden to special interests to create any meaningful change
76% of Americans agree with the statement that America cannot succeed unless we take on and defeat the corruption and crony capitalism in our government
75% believe that the US government is NOT working for the people’s best interest
75% believe that powerful interests have used campaign and lobbying money to rig the system for themselves
74% see the biased and slanted coverage of the media as part of the problem
72% of Americans believe the U.S. has a two-track economy, where most Americans struggle every day, where good jobs are hard to find, and where huge corporations get all the rewards
72% believe that the reason families in our middle class have not seen their economic condition improve for decades and economic growth is stalled is because of corruption and crony capitalism in Washington
71% believe our government is not only dysfunctional, it is collapsing right before our eyes
70% believe the government in Washington does not govern with the consent of the people
The majority – 56% – say they wish there were a third party with a chance of success to fight for their interests
Only 15% say the “values and principals of my political party are so important that I strongly prefer to vote for the candidates of my party…”
They concluded:
The country [is] in a prerevolutionary moment.
***
This election could mark the beginning of the end of two-party duopoly in the United States.
***
The people believe the real struggle for America is not between Democrats and Republicans, but between mainstream America and the ruling political elites of incumbent politicians, lobbyists, big business, big unions, big banks, big special interests and the big media. [The people are correct.]
***
The power elite asks, “When will this be over?” Although this is seen as a chaotic and temporary situation by most of the political and media establishment, our research shows a strong, evolving tidal wave of discontent and growing pressure for real and dramatic change.
***
Real change is what that the establishment fears most and fights hardest against. It is ultimately a losing battle.
***
This, in fact, is a revolution.
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/02/overwhelming-majority-americans-believe-parties-corrupt-change-anything-americans-want-revolution.html
__________________________________________
LikeLike