Corporate Sponsored: How To Manage Civilization Via Crises

This Sputnik article, which derives from a Boston Globe article (which I could not find, but I believe it may be this one) by Stephen Kinzer. It is another example of how the corporate/media/government complex “manages” the “news”, aka, “propaganda line”.

“The US media is skillfully lying about world affairs, delivering contrived narratives that are generated by the Pentagon, the State Department and the White House and misinforming the public; the ignorance this process generates is very dangerous because Americans “act on it”

““Reporters who cover Syria check with the Pentagon, the State Department, the White House, and think tank “experts.” After a spin on that soiled carousel, they feel they have covered all sides of the story. This form of stenography produces the pabulum that passes for news about Syria,” he says. As a result, much of the American press is reporting the opposite of what is actually happening, the author acknowledges.

“However, Kinzer warns the ignorance of ordinary Americans is even more dangerous, because they “act on it”. “The United States has the power to decree the death of nations,” he says. “And it can do so with popular support because many Americans — and many journalists — are content with the official story.”“

————————————————–

Storytelling: How Washington Manages America’s Perception of World Affairs

The US media is skillfully lying about world affairs, delivering contrived narratives that are generated by the Pentagon, the State Department and the White House and misinforming the public; the ignorance this process generates is very dangerous because Americans “act on it”, according to foreign policy expert Stephen Kinzer.

American public is being constantly misinformed about the global affairs, Stephen Kinzer, a senior fellow at the Watson Institute for International Studies at Brown University, writes in his article for The Boston Globe.

The news on the developments around the world are generated in Pentagon, the State Department, the White House and by think tank “experts”, who deliver the official point of view.

“Under intense financial pressure, most American newspapers, magazines, and broadcast networks have drastically reduced their corps of foreign correspondents. Much important news about the world now comes from reporters based in Washington,” he says.

“In that environment, access and credibility depend on acceptance of official paradigms,” he adds.

The author cites as an example the coverage of the crisis in Syria.

“Reporters who cover Syria check with the Pentagon, the State Department, the White House, and think tank “experts.” After a spin on that soiled carousel, they feel they have covered all sides of the story. This form of stenography produces the pabulum that passes for news about Syria,” he says.

As a result, much of the American press is reporting the opposite of what is actually happening, the author acknowledges.

“Americans are being told that the virtuous course in Syria is to fight the Assad regime and its Russian and Iranian partners. We are supposed to hope that a righteous coalition of Americans, Turks, Saudis, Kurds, and the “moderate opposition” will win,” Stephen Kinzer continues.

“This is convoluted nonsense, but Americans cannot be blamed for believing it. We have almost no real information about the combatants, their goals, or their tactics. Much blame for this lies with our media,” he further states.

Everything Russia and Iran do in Syria is described as negative and destabilizing, simply because it is they who are doing it — and because that is the official line in Washington, Kinzer says.

“Astonishingly brave correspondents in the war zone, including Americans, seek to counteract Washington-based reporting. At great risk to their own safety, these reporters are pushing to find the truth about the Syrian war. Their reporting often illuminates the darkness of groupthink. Yet for many consumers of news, their voices are lost in the cacophony. Reporting from the ground is often overwhelmed by the Washington consensus.”However, Kinzer warns the ignorance of ordinary Americans is even more dangerous, because they “act on it”.

“The United States has the power to decree the death of nations,” he says. “And it can do so with popular support because many Americans — and many journalists — are content with the official story.”