7 comments on “Looking into the G20 Summit in Brisbane this weekend
  1. RonMamita says:

    Bank deposits will soon no longer be considered money but paper investments

    By Kenneth Schortgen Jr, published on Examiner.com, on November 12, 2014



    This weekend the G20 nations will convene in Brisbane, Australia to conclude a week of Asian festivities that began in Beijing for the developed countries and major economies. And on Sunday, the biggest deal of the week will be made as the G20 will formally announce new banking rules that are expected to send shock waves to anyone holding a checking, savings, or money market account in a financial institution.

    On Nov. 16, the G20 will implement a new policy that makes bank deposits on par with paper investments, subjecting account holders to declines that one might experience from holding a stock or other security when the next financial banking crisis occurs. Additionally, all member nations of the G20 will immediately submit and pass legislation that will fulfill this program, creating a new paradigm where banks no longer recognize your deposits as money, but as liabilities and securitized capital owned and controlled by the bank or institution.

    In essence, the Cyprus template of 2011 will be fully implemented in every major economy, and place bank depositors as the primary instrument of the next bailouts when the next crisis occurs.

    On Sunday in Brisbane the G20 will announce that bank deposits are just part of commercial banks’ capital structure, and also that they are far from the most senior portion of that structure. With deposits then subjected to a decline in nominal value following a bank failure, it is self-evident that a bank deposit is no longer money in the way a banknote is. If a banknote cannot be subjected to a decline in nominal value, we need to ask whether banknotes can act as a superior store of value than bank deposits? If that is the case, will some investors prefer banknotes to bank deposits as a form of savings? Such a change in preference is known as a “bank run.”

    Each country will introduce its own legislation to effect the ‘ bail-in’ agreed by the G20 this coming weekend.

    Large deposits at banks are no longer money, as this legislation will formally push them down through the capital structure to a position of material capital risk in any “failing” institution. In our last financial crisis, deposits were de facto guaranteed by the state, but from November 16th holders of large-scale deposits will be, both de facto and de jure, just another creditor squabbling over their share of the assets of a failed bank. – Zerohedge

    For most Americans with savings or checking accounts in federally insured banks, normal FDIC rules on deposit insurance are still in play, but anyone with over $250,000 in any one account, or held offshore, will have their money automatically subject to bankruptcy dispursements from the courts based on a much lower rank of priority, and a much lower percentage of return.

    This also includes business accounts, money market accounts, and any depository investments such as a certificate of deposit (CD).

    What makes this sudden push to securitize cash held as bank deposits is the pending question of whether the central banks or sovereign governments know that a crisis is forthcoming, especially in light of Europe’s rapid decline into recession, and Japan’s need to monetize their entire budget through central bank easing?

    Just as people thought the ownership of gold and silver was inviolate prior to 1933 when the government ordered it confiscated to bailout the banks and Federal Reserve during the Great Depression, we are all now faced with the realization that the money we thought was our own, and protected in our checking and savings accounts no longer is. And after Sunday at the G20 meeting, the risks of holding any cash in a bank or financial institution will have to be weighed as heavily and with as much determination of risk as if you were holding a stock or municipal bond, which could decline in an instant should the financial environment bring a crisis even remotely similar to that of 2008.


  2. RonMamita says:

    BRICS leaders unhappy with slow IMF reforms


    The BRICS leaders, including Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Saturday reaffirmed their disappointment and serious concern over the non-implementation of the 2010 International Monetary Fund (IMF) reforms.
    In a statement released after an informal meeting hours ahead of the G20 Summit here, the leaders agreed that the slow action on IMF reforms undermined the “legitimacy and credibility” of IMF.
    “Undue delays in ratifying the 2010 agreement are in contradiction with the joint commitment by the G20 Leaders since 2009,” Xinhua quoted the statement as saying, adding that if the US failed to ratify the reform agreement by the year-end, the G20 should schedule a discussion of the options for the IMF future reforms in January 2015.
    In November 2010, the IMF announced that its board of executive directors had approved historic reforms, including shifting more than 6 percent of quotas from advanced economies to “dynamic” emerging and developing countries by 2012.

    Read full report: http://www.easternmirrornagaland.com/2014/11/brics-leaders-unhappy-with-slow-imf-reforms/


  3. RonMamita says:

    Xi Jinping attended the G20 summit : the early establishment of BRICS Bank

    Chinese President Xi Jinping attended the meeting and entitled “Promoting innovation and development linkage growth” important speech advocates promote development partners to do economic reform , the implementation of a comprehensive growth strategy to promote the transition from cyclical recovery in the world economy to sustainable growth.

    G20 summit held its first meeting on the 15th stage . Leaders around the world participating members of the economic situation , to promote growth and employment issues to speak.

    Xi Jinping at the summit called for the construction of an open world economy. He said the expansion of world trade , countries will benefit. World markets narrowed , no good for countries . We want to continue to do the standard-bearer of global free trade and safeguard the multilateral trading system , to build a win-win global value chains , foster global market. To continue to oppose trade and investment protectionism.

    Xi stressed that China’s economic growth is an important engine for world economic growth. China ‘s economy will remain strong , sustainable and balanced growth , the annual incremental contribution equivalent to the size of a medium- developed countries. China will provide more demand for the world economy and create more market opportunities , investment opportunities and growth opportunities. He announced that China will adopt the IMF Special Data Dissemination Standard .

    Xi pointed out that G20 members to establish a community of interests and destiny of the sense of community efforts to form a mutually reinforcing growth countries , the pattern of win-win cooperation complement each other , so that the Group of Twenty truly become a world economic stability , global growth, catalytic converters , propeller global economic governance .

    The same day, Xi Jinping also attended the G20 summit in informal discussions , a speech on the economic reform agenda. Xi introduced China ‘s overall goal of deepening reform and initiatives , emphasizing the Chinese economy has entered a period of opportunity to the way of structural adjustment , foster opportunities endogenous growth momentum and improve employment and livelihood opportunities , the Chinese economy has entered a new normal , growth momentum abundant, bright prospects for development . I hope all countries to come up with the political courage to dare to dare to break established , innovative development, doing a total of promoting economic reform development partners .

    In China , the US, Australia , driven by the Conference adopted the ” G20 leaders to deal with Ebola outbreak Brisbane Declaration ” calling for the strengthening of international cooperation to jointly cope with the Ebola outbreak.

    Increase in emerging market countries say

    Xi Jinping, the Group of Twenty recommendations made ​​efforts in the following aspects.

    First , innovation and development. States should develop innovative ideas, policies , methods, especially through structural reforms , taxation, finance, investment, competition, trade , employment and other areas , by combining macroeconomic policies and social policies , so vibrant wealth creation to unleash the market force the full release . We should pay attention to the pulling effect of infrastructure on the economy. The Chinese side during the APEC informal leadership meeting hosted by the interoperability as one of the core issues. China supports the establishment of the Group of Twenty global infrastructure center to support World Bank established the Global Infrastructure Fund , and the Silk Road through the construction of the economic zone, the Maritime Silk Road of the 21st century , the Asian infrastructure investment banks , funds and other Silk Road route , to contribute to the global infrastructure investment .

    Second, the construction of an open world economy. Countries should safeguard the multilateral trading system , to build a win-win global value chains , foster global market , oppose trade and investment protectionism, the Doha Round negotiations .

    Third, improve global economic governance . States need to focus on the construction of a fair and just , inclusive and orderly international financial system , increase in emerging market countries and the representation and voice of developing countries to ensure equal rights for all countries in the international economic cooperation , equality of opportunity , equality rules. According to Xinhua News Agency

    Xi Jinping : BRICS Development Bank hope to establish as soon as possible

    BRICS leaders held an informal meeting in Brisbane on the 15th , Chinese President Xi Jinping , Brazilian President Rousseff , Russian President Vladimir Putin , Prime Minister of India Modi , South African President Jacob Zuma to attend. Five leaders of the BRICS cooperation and major international and regional issues, in-depth exchange of views and reached a high degree of consensus.

    Xi Jinping said in his speech pointed out that economic cooperation is to promote the development of BRICS lasting power , we must be based on open, inclusive , cooperative and win-win spirit BRIC countries remain committed to the construction of large integrated market , finance large circulation , infrastructure interconnection facilities , humanities big exchanges , develop long-term planning of economic cooperation , the establishment of closer economic partnership. BRICS Development Bank and establish contingency arrangements is a serious matter , to carry out the work .

    Xi stressed that the BRICS cooperation to achieve political and economic ” wheel ” drive , not only do the economic engine of the world , but do Shield of international peace , deepen coordination and cooperation in international politics and security, to defend international justice .

    Xi pointed out that BRIC countries should actively participate in international multilateral cooperation , improve voice in global economic governance . We want to strengthen the Group of Twenty summit to be held in Brisbane coordination and cooperation , and promote a positive outcome , is committed to building an open world economy , the implementation of IMF reform program to promote solutions to global development issues.

    Leaders attending the summit , said the emerging economies should strive to maintain growth , and actively promote global economic governance . About the developed countries should adopt responsible monetary policies to prevent spillover effects , increased investment , looking for sustainable growth momentum. IMF quota reform program should be implemented as soon as possible . BRIC countries should strengthen all-round cooperation , implement the outcome of the meeting Fortaleza, Brazil , to accelerate the BRICS Development Bank and the contingency reserve arrangements building process.

    Xi responded APEC Blue : collaborative governance attempt by the wind

    November 14th is the day Xi Jinping visit the couple departed . Takeoff , after a smooth , Xi and Peng Liyuan into the rear compartment , the reporters came to the middle. This is the most precious time face to face interview . Speaking to reporters accompanying Xi Jinping recent hot words : “APEC blue .”

    Xi said , “We can not avoid this issue .” He used a very dialectical words: turn bad for good. “We realized that the haze is bad, the formation of a consensus , the initiative to control haze , wake up and improve the environmental awareness, not a good thing? “

    During this time there are users questioned : stop the plant , off the boiler , and put a fake , is not it a bit formalism ?

    Xi Jinping on the pros and cons to look very far : ” APEC is actually borrowed the east , to try to promote collaborative governance initiatives of several provinces and joint action , and ultimately reduce emissions more than three percent this for our future industrial restructuring . and the industrial layout, have accumulated useful experience. this is a practical effort not just to meet . “

    ( Original title : Xi Jinping attended the G20 summit : the establishment of the BRICS bank as soon as possible )

    Original link: http://news.163.com/14/1116/10/AB5PS3DF000146BE.html


  4. RonMamita says:

    Brisbane Sign for G20

    The G20 Code: 2014 Summit Agenda in Plain English

    The G20 Code: 2014 Summit Agenda in Plain English

    While the 2014 G20 Summit in Brisbane, Australia is in full swing, Sputnik looks at the real meanings behind the political clichés on the group’s agenda, often criticized for being long and unfocused.

    It’s as hard to ignore the sheer volume of this weekend’s articles, videos, reports and other analytical pieces on the G20 Summit in Australia, as it is to actually understand what the world’s leaders want to achieve this time around, given that the official agenda for the summit looks as if it’s been copied – with minor re-arrangements – from last year. Here is a selection of what the G20 itself considers ‘key’ to global prosperity, explained in terms of what the group has to do to justify the very long flight to Australia’s eastern coast.

    Goal No. 1: In September 2013, G20 Leaders in St Petersburg committed to develop comprehensive growth strategies for each of their countries by the Brisbane summit in 2014.

    Growth strategy is an umbrella term, a euphemism even, for figuring out a way to prevent Great Depression II. And the 20 leaders are expected to have done their homework before the Brisbane summit, voicing the policy recommendations to lift global GDP growth by another 2 percent over five years. Although both the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) are optimistic about the policies submitted so far, the timeframe for the promised action is so long, that everyone may simply forget the commitment and waste the entire effort. Detail, instruction and oversight is what this number one buzzword really needs to become if it’s to be as meaningful as intended. Experts suggest the IMF and/or OECD should take on the monitoring of the promised growth. This may be reasonable, but the proposed ‘watchdogs’ are themselves part of the G20’s excruciatingly broad idea of a better tomorrow.

    Goal No. 2: “G20 country growth strategies will contain a mix of macroeconomic and structural reforms at the domestic level that suit each country’s circumstances in areas with the greatest potential to lift global growth by reducing barriers to trade.

    There’s nothing like liberal, unobstructed and fair international trade to pull the world economy into a soothing stage of growth and expansion. Most unfortunately, the multilateral trading system, largely revolving around the World Trade Organization (WTO), has never seen its confidence levels as low as today. Protectionist measures – an all-time favourite solution for periods of economic distress – will have to go. In practice, this means implementing the Agreement on Trade Facilitation as soon as possible, skipping formal ratification under the WTO.

    Wait a minute. That would mean trying to reenergize the WTO by discrediting its existing decision-making mechanisms. The approach is unusual, at best. As if this isn’t complicated enough, there’s the recurrent sanctions rhetoric in the West around Russia and its trading partners. Politics and speculation aside, such a state of things simply deadlocks possible solutions on the future of the Doha Round or any measures on the expansion and governance of global value chains.

    Goal No. 3: In 2014, G20 members are building the resilience of the global economy by reforming global institutions to ensure countries that are reshaping the global economy have a greater voice and keep the institutions relevant.

    Although used in the plural, the focus of the G20 leaders is reforming one key institution, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which was what everyone agreed on back in 2010. The group intended to revise the IMF quota arrangements and governance mechanism. What this really means is that 19 out of the 20 participating states will have to push the US Congress into following through on these reforms, as it is currently blocking the outlined change. Washington has the largest IMF quota, which comes with the power to veto any reform. Therefore, the real question is whether the G20 has enough authority to persuade the new Republican-dominated Congress to stop holding back progress on promises made 4 years ago. Ultimately, this may be too liberal a dream. Meanwhile, the BRICS states have already launched an initiative establishing a solid alternative to the IMF, whose resources, distribution mechanism and oversight principles are hardly objective in terms of who gets the much-needed assistance. As the BRICS are also part of the G20, we may expect a shift towards working around the IMF stalemate through regional or similar supranational arrangements.

    Goal No. 4: In 2014, G20 members are building the resilience of the global economy by strengthening energy market resilience, improving the operation of global energy markets for greater efficiency and transparency.

    Transparency is the political term for “I need to know what you are up to. At all times!” While this would obviously help even out certain unbalances in the market, the ambitious goal falls into the “trust” trap, whereby nations that rely on the energy sector for their economic growth wouldn’t be willing to let the entire world know how they run their business. Since the focus is on gas markets, it gets even trickier. Natural gas supplied through pipelines is priced per every specific contract, and liquefied natural gas (LNG) requires highly specific infrastructure and has to be priced based on how much it costs to recover it. The coveted transparency has to come with clear ground rules on how information is used, hence a new multilateral agreement, another global negotiation, another dragged-out attempt to reach consensus among actors with very different goals. Finally, it will be interesting to follow what the G20 leaders agree to on inefficient fossil fuel subsidies. How would fracking play into the picture, given that it’s barely regulated but already controversial worldwide. A global economy powered by hydrocarbons will need more than a weekend getaway in Brisbane to shift towards a new fully resilient and transparent energy market.

    In a situation where well-worded G20 goals overlap, contradict one another or become mutually exclusive, even the hundreds of millions of dollars spent on the Brisbane Summit may ultimately fail to go far. The group’s unflattering history of falling short of its ambitions, compounded this year by little willingness among the 20 leaders to cooperate, may become the G20’s last straw. At the end of the weekend, 20 presidents may be coming back from Australia with nothing but a bad case of jet lag.

    Source: http://us.sputniknews.com/world/20141115/1013225118.html


  5. RonMamita says:

    3 reports list reasons to comprehend the deception that BRICS and G20 offer a solution:


    China Wants Its Own ‘New World Order’ To Oppose US Version
    By Martin Sieff UPI Senior News Analyst 2-6-2

    MUNICH, Germany (UPI) – There was a cloud no larger than the size of a man’s hand in the sky of U.S. global leadership at the annual NATO Security Conference, or Wehrkunde, in Munich, Germany, this weekend. But it will get bigger. It was the quiet emergence of China as the leader of a potentially global block dedicated to oppose the United States.

    When Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Wang Yi addressed the prestigious annual forum of NATO defense ministers in this historic Bavarian city, he heralded the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, founded only last June, as the crucial “new security concept” necessary to guarantee peace and stability in Central Asia, and to lead the fight there against terrorism.

    So important was this idea of a “new security concept” to Chinese policy that Wang used the phrase four times in his formal speech.

    He also clearly identified what it was.

    “The birth and growth of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization embodies the practice of the new security concept by China, Russia and some Central Asian countries,” Wang told the conference of defense and political leaders from more than 40 countries.

    The SCO was set up last June 15 at a summit in the southern Chinese city of Shanghai attended by Chinese President Jiang Zemin, Russian President Vladimir Putin and the leaders of several Central Asian nations. Its military cooperation structure was deliberately modeled in part on the old Soviet-led Warsaw Pact and it includes nations with more than a quarter of the human race with more than 2 million soldiers under arms.

    Whether by fortuitous accident or deliberate design, the organization was set up the very same day President George W. Bush, speaking in the Polish capital, Warsaw, pledged to extend the NATO alliance to include all the nations of Central and Eastern Europe.

    The Russian and Chinese leaders in Shanghai left no doubt that the SCO, also referred to as the Shanghai Pact, was a military cooperation organization devoted to preserve what they called “multi-polarity” in the world. “Multi-polarity” is a Russian and Chinese diplomatic word for opposing U.S. global domination which, by contrast, Moscow and Beijing both see as “uni-polar.”

    The creation of the Shanghai Pact last June was virtually ignored in the American media, though national security adviser Condoleezza Rice was reported to have taken its creation seriously enough to seek to woo Russia with closer ties.

    Later, Putin’s rapid and controversial decision to fully support U.S. military operations to topple the Taliban regime in Afghanistan and to destroy the al Qaida terrorist organization the Taliban protected appeared to show Russia was not embracing China fully and still wanted to retain and develop strong ties with Washington.

    But U.S. statements and moves to retain its military presence in Central Asia since the toppling of the Taliban have infuriated Russian officials and media pundits. Several of them have compared the move to the United States abandoning its 1990-91 pledge to Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev never to try and expand NATO to include former Soviet Warsaw Pact military allies in Central Europe. But at the 1997 NATO Madrid summit, the United States did just that, opening the way for the Visegrad Three states — Poland, the Czech Republic and Hungary — to join the Atlantic Alliance.

    At the Munich Wehrkunde, Russian Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov did not mention the Shanghai Pact in his own speech. Yet it was the centerpiece of Wang’s.

    Wang spoke in English, fluently but flatly. His speech and delivery lacked any rhetorical flourishes and journalists covering the conference paid little attention to it even while was delivering it.

    But Wang’s speech marked an important diplomatic milestone. It marked for the first time the emergence of China on the world scene not just as a great power and rising potential superpower in its own right, but also as the clear leader of an international security organization which by its very nature revealed sweeping ambitions for regional hegemony ambitions comparable to NATO and the old Soviet-led Warsaw Pact.

    The SCO, Wang said, already “played a positive role in maintaining peace and stability in the region (of Central Asia) and made (a) due contribution to the ongoing international cooperation against terrorism.” Already, China and its fellow SCO members, he said “have taken joint steps to fight terrorism through closer regional multilateral cooperation.”

    Wang urged the need to close the global gap between rich and poor nations which, he said, created the breeding grounds of poverty, resentment and hatred from which terrorism sprang.

    “Fighting terrorism needs to address both its symptoms and root caused” he said. “… An important prerequisite in this connection is to resolve the question of development and narrow the gap between the (global) North and the South.”

    He concluded his speech by making clear China did not believe the current world order could produce lasting peace and prosperity, and that it was ready to establish far-reaching ties with other nations to create a “fair and equitable new world order” that would.

    “China is ready to strengthen its coordination and cooperation with all other countries in the conduct of international affairs, security included, and work vigorously toward a world that enjoys lasting peace and universal prosperity with a fair and equitable new international order,” he said.

    Readers of UPI Analysis should remember that final phrase “fair and equitable new international order” with which Wang ended his speech. It clearly indicates China finds the current world order neither capable of bringing peace and prosperity, nor maintaining either of them. Beijing, therefore, is determined to “work vigorously” toward creating such a “new international order” and is “ready to strengthen its coordination and cooperation” with any other country that feels the same way.

    No major world power has used that kind of language since the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War before its last, mild spring period of détente.

    Wang never raised his voice and did not bang any table like Nazis or many old Soviet leaders. And he never criticized the United States by name. As a result, no one paid any attention to what he actually said.

    They should.


    The Truth About G20 Banking Directive

    LEGALLY MONEY IN A BANK HAS NEVER BEEN YOUR’S – nothing has changed. What has changed is that government is reneging on the New Deal and Socialism. The entire reason for creating the FDIC was for the government to regulate banks and thus ensure them. The money is simply NOT yours and NEVER was once you deposit it into a bank. You become the same as a shareholder possessing merely a claim as an UNSECURED creditor in the case of a bankruptcy.

    G20 is recognizing this LEGAL status and simply saying – HEY, there is NO obligation to bail anyone out. Remember I explained the Constitution is NEGATIVE not POSITIVE and that means there is NO legal obligation upon government to do anything for society but restrain its own actions.The is part of the DEFLATIONARY warning I have been saying all along and getting a ton of shit for. This is NOT going down the road of HYPERINFLATION – this is DEFLATION. The destruction of capital not the expansion of it. I have warned this is the COLLAPSE of Socialism. That means government walks away from its promises – it will not print money into oblivion.

    Governments are walking away from Socialism That is the ONLY change – nothing else. Nobody stole your bank account because it was NEVER yours to begin with. This is being completely misreported once again. If you do NOT understand the system, how can you make claims about it. People will act in the exact wrong manner with false info.

    BEWARE of sophistry here. These statements are NOT true. Money did not die nor did anyone take your account, which was legally NEVER yours to start with. When you deposit money in a bank, you are agreeing to allow them to lend it out meaning its is not your’s anymore. If you deposit a $20 bill, you do not get the same exact $20 billion when you withdraw.

    I do not know how I can explain this any better. They simply reneged on bailing out the banks. The last collapse 2007-2009 has been devastating. I keep warning liquidity is down 50%, then they are hunting money like crazy stopping global capital flows resulting in higher systemic unemployment with greater volatility on the horizon. Go ahead and withdraw $20,000 in cash. Then the police will stand right behind you and confiscate it under Civil Asset Forfeiture presuming the MONEY is guilty without having to prove you committed any crime. Reasonable people for not carry $20,000 in cash – you must be a criminal in their view.


    This is a serious issue that should NOT be spun to scare people. Come on. These stories can seriously hurt people. This is the collapse in Socialism – the government walking away from its promises. That is the bottom line. Your credit cards will still work and they will move faster toward electronic money and that will prevent bank runs. How will you take your money out of a bank? Say please, put it on this CD-ROM?


    15 2014
    The Rockefeller Plan for the BRICS New World Order, in their own words…

    Decades before President George H.W. Bush introduced the “New World Order” (NWO) into the American vernacular, the Rockefeller family and their minions were making plans to expend America’s post-World War 2 power to bring about such an order. In the course of researching Laurance Rockefeller for my last entry, Why are the Rockefellers and the Jesuits guiding the UFO Disclosure Movement?, I came across a book titled Prospect for America: The Rockefeller Panel Reports
    …It was the product of a 1956 Rockefeller Brothers Fund effort known as the Special Studies Project, and it lays out the blueprint for the multilateral / multipolar New World Order that is currently materializing around us.

    In the aftermath of World War 2 and the resulting formation of the United Nations (which the Rockefellers were instrumental in creating and funding), the Special Studies Project, directed by Henry Kissinger, was formed to carry out two apparent tasks:

    1) to create an action plan to bring about the “elite’s” long-sought world government within the existing postwar environment, and

    2) to spin the agenda in such a way that it could be sold to the American people as being in their best interest.

    Upon completion of their work, the Special Studies Project’s various panels compiled their reports in an incomplete, sanitized, and heavily spun book, the above-mentioned Prospect for America. The book spells out how to sacrifice the national interests of the United States for…
    …(from page 35)

    To begin our journey through the Rockefeller plan for the NWO, let’s start with their definition of the Old World Order (OWO).

    The 13 Empires of the Old World Order

    From pages 163-164 of Prospect for America

    So after having consolidated power over most of the world through empire building, the Occulted Powers (OPs) faced a problem. Empires, by their very nature, are territorial, competitive and nationalistic, and are not amenable to submitting to outside control as would be required for world governance. Clearly, these old structures would need to be demolished and replaced by newer, more malleable structures in order to finish the global consolidation. For this reason, the OPs fomented and financed the two world wars to break down the old empires and create international chaos from which a New Order could be birthed.

    At the end of each world war, the OPs immediately planted the seed of global governance, but the seeds didn’t germinate as expected…
    …(from page 164)

    De-spinning the last underlined statement, they are basically saying that the nations were insufficiently motivated to hand over sovereignty to the globalist institutions. So to overcome this lack of “shared aspirations,” the OPs fostered the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union.

    By threatening some nations with Soviet aggression and others with American aggression, they compelled the nations to band together and join sides for protection. The members of each side were then pressured to increase economic and defensive cooperation to fend off the menace of the other side. Those who were programmed to believe they lived in the “people’s (communist) world” cooperated to block aggression from the “imperialist world,” and those who were programmed to believe they lived in the “free world” cooperated to block aggression from the “Soviet sphere”…
    …(from page 180)

    In the United States, people were programmed to believe that fending off the “Red Menace” was a matter of life and death…
    …(from page 162)

    But the Cold War, just like the current crop of engineered conflicts raging about us (ISIS, Ukraine, and the China Seas), was all about forcing nations into groups and groups into a world order. Once it had served its purpose, the Cold War was ended in order to allow the two sides to be merged under the NWO. And as one would expect, Prospect for America offers a glimpse of what the NWO will look like.

    The New World Order

    On page 26, we’re told what the OPs and their globalist minions are hoping for…

    Take note of how the passage says “combined so as to be able to deal with those problems that increasingly the separate nations will not be able to solve alone.” Here they are telling us that they’ll be purposefully creating increasingly difficult problems to compel the nations to accept the NWO. We’ve certainly been witnessing that, haven’t we?

    As for the NWO structure itself, we’re told that it will “consist of regional institutions under an international body of growing [to the point of total control] authority.” Elsewhere in the book, we’re told that the NWO will also include functional structures for matters that require management beyond the regional boundaries. So let’s delve deeper into how such a structure would look and operate:

    1) At the top is the “international body of growing authority.” Needless to say, this is…
    …(from page 33) Also note this…
    …(from page 35)

    2) Below the UN will be the…
    …(from page 189)

    Here are the ten UN development regions…

    And page 190 spells out how the regional arrangements will manifest themselves…

    Free trade agreements, joint economic development institutions, exchange agreements — this all sounds very familiar, doesn’t it? So when an East versus West propagandist tries to sell you the idea that the BRICS Development Bank or a Chinese/Russian currency swap deal demonstrates nations trying to free themselves from the New World Order, just remember this passage. Russia and China are following the NWO script to the letter, but I’ll get back to this point a little later in the article.

    3) Below the UN will also be…
    …(from page 191)

    One example of a functional arrangement is the BRICS alliance. It cuts across regional lines and gives form to the dialectic clash between Anglo-American bankers and BRICS bankers which will birth the NWO. Another example is the International Monetary Fund, which will manage the new global reserve currency after the engineered East versus West drama has climaxed.

    With the planned structure of the New World Order laid before us, let’s have a look at how the Rockefellers planned to get America to join in.

    The NWO as America’s Grand Objective

    Prospect for America goes to great lengths to make the counterintuitive case that building a global government is in America’s best interest. It starts by implying that nation-states are somehow outmoded by the fact that they trade with each other, and then it offers the false choice of floundering by engaging in no trade at all…
    …(from page 60) or prospering by engaging in trade managed by the NWO…
    …(from page 161) They conveniently fail to mention that there are many other options besides resorting to either of those two extremes.

    Kissinger and Co. also make the assertion that building the NWO is the “grand objective” of America’s foreign policy…
    …(from page 26) and that the effectiveness of US policy will be judged by how well America fosters the globalist institutions…
    …(from page 27) Also note how the passage assigns the US to the Western Sphere. The planners had another nation in mind to lead the Eastern Sphere (China).

    The book then goes on to offer specific ways America can sacrifice its national interests to build the global government.

    The Deindustrialization of America

    On page 173, we see the genesis of the economic policies that have brought the American economy to ruin…
    …as the globalists make the case for unilaterally removing the trade barriers that protected America’s economy from competition with foreign slave labor.

    Kissinger and Co. also make the case that we shouldn’t economically defend ourselves since it might create “impediments… to the progress of others”…
    …(from page 75)

    And to give Americans a taste of what’s coming, page 75 also drops this little hint…
    …As it turns out, America did indeed lay itself down as a bridge to pull China into the NWO. We did it by luring them in with a great deal of our national wealth through lopsided trade and outsourcing.

    And this brings us to the subject of the BRICS…

    The BRICS role in erecting the New World Order

    Prospect goes on to address the status of those nations that were “freed” by the engineered collapse of the Old World Order…
    …(from page 164)

    If we remove the spin from this passage, it tells us that the new nation-states’ drive to achieve true independence must be “balanced by converging forces.” And what form did these “converging forces” take? The globalists employed hot & cold wars and insurgencies, trade conflicts, and “economic hit men” to make life unbearable for any nation-state attempting to be independent. All this strife forced such nations to reach out to international institutions for “help” (which came in the form of military occupation or debt bondage).

    Only in the arms of the globalist institutions would such nations find any peace…
    …(from page 61)

    When Prospect spoke on page 60 of what animates such peoples…
    …it brought to mind something I wrote in an old article titled David Wilcock and the Real NWO, Part 2 of 2:

    >>>Why China? Why would the Illuminati, whose home base is in Western Europe, have the Chinese front the public face of their New World Order?

    A clue to their motivations and strategy can be found in this article, titled “Colonial Elite Rules China for the Illuminati.” In it, the author states…

    “The Chinese people would revolt against overt foreign domination, but embrace their place in the NWO if they believed they were in control.”

    The Chinese have suffered greatly at the hands of Western imperialism, as has much of the world. As a result, the Illuminati would have trouble roping many nations into a Western-led New World Order, especially the nationalistic Chinese. Since you can’t have a truly global order without the most populous nation on Earth, the Illuminati opted to use their own legacy of destruction to their advantage. Their two-part strategy to do so is as follows:

    1 – They set up a China-centered alliance as an opposing force to the Western alliance.
    This part of the strategy was hinted at in the mainstream press in this 2002 UPI article, titled “China Wants Its Own ‘New World Order’ To Oppose US Version.” It is common practice for the Cabal to use opposing forces to achieve their ends, and they always make sure they have influence or control over both sides.

    2 – They have been driving the world public into the hands of the Chinese alliance.
    How have they approached this, you ask?

    > They have widely publicized a heinous New World Order planned by the Western Powers while simultaneously publicizing a benign New World Order planned by China and its allies (thus establishing danger from one side and safety from another).

    > They have instigated outrageous and provocative action, both economic and military, by the Western powers (this adds a new insight into the open-for-all-to-see Wall Street / City of London criminality and recent Western military boondoggles in Afghanistan, Iraq, Egypt, Libya, and Syria).

    > They have broadly exposed damaging information about Western nations, especially the US. This is the motivation behind WikiLeaks, Snowden, and a thousand smaller disclosures. And after Snowden outed the NSA’s activities to the general public, where did he run to hide? First to China (Hong Kong), then to Russia. So what is the psychological message? China and Russia (the BRICS alliance) are where you run for safety from the evil US, its Western allies, and all their horrible behavior.

    It is really very simple: the Illuminati built a rabbit trap (in the BRICS alliance) that looks like a nice, safe hole to hide from danger. Now they are beating the bushes (with the Western powers) to drive the rabbits toward the trap.<<<

    Clearly, the globalists took into account “the aspirations of peoples all over the globe… to emerge rapidly and conclusively from the era of colonialism” in their planning of the NWO. It is for this reason that the BRICS alliance was formed and the NWO was designed in a multipolar fashion. They want the oppressed peoples of the world to join together and see themselves beating the West. And they want them to believe that the Illuminati’s multipolar New World Order represents their final victory over oppression and ascension to equality, when it is actually just the beginning of a new phase of subjugation and their fall into equality as global serfs.

    With the Rockefeller plan for the BRICS New World Order laid out before us, let’s take a look at how it was implemented.

    China: Building up the False Savior

    Major moves towards building the New World Order outlined in Prospect for America began in the late sixties…

    1969 – The International Monetary Fund (IMF) introduces the Special Drawing Right, the planned replacement for the US dollar as the global reserve currency

    July 1971 – former Special Studies Project director Henry Kissinger held secret meetings in China to lay the groundwork for their introduction onto the global stage. Here he is with Chinese Premier Chou En-Lai (a.k.a. Zhou Enlai) during the visit…

    August 1971 – President Richard Nixon takes America off of the gold standard…
    …This was the first major explosion in the dollar’s demolition as the global reserve currency (to make way for its replacement by the globalists’ SDR sometime around 2018).

    February 1972 – Nixon visits (and “opens”) China. Here he is with Chairman Mao…

    June 1973 – David Rockefeller Sr. visits China to start working out implementation details for what is to come. Here he is meeting with Premier Chou En-Lai…

    So what was set in motion by these events? By 1978, Deng Xiaoping took power and “developed ‘Socialism with Chinese characteristics’ and Chinese economic reform, also known as the ‘socialist market economy,’ and opened China to the global market.” An interesting view on the hidden dynamics behind this development is offered in the above-linked “Colonial Elite Rules China for the Illuminati” article…

    “Wang Hao, a historian at the China Institute of International Studies, has recorded that Mao’s deputy Zhou Enlai met David Rockefeller in June 1973:

    ‘When meeting David Rockefeller, Zhou said to him that it was necessary to find appropriate methods conducive to the development of the trade between two sides under different political systems.’

    The corporate-communist merger began when Deng Xiaoping came to power in the late 1970s and introduced his market reforms with the slogan ‘to get rich is glorious.’

    However, after 30 years of Maoism his regime was hopelessly ill equipped to run a market economy. They turned to the wealthiest Chinese tycoons in Hong Kong for guidance.

    The most powerful HK tycoon is Li Ka-Shing, the richest Asian in the world and an Illuminati insider.”

    (For Fritz Springmeier’s writeup on the Illuminati Li family, click here.)

    This helped put in place a Chinese elite that “is a merger between the Communist leadership, Hong Kong tycoons, and the criminal Triads. All three factions derive their power from Illuminati collaboration.”

    Needless to say, globalist coordination with China…
    …and their BRICS partner Russia…
    …has continued unabated to this day.

    In closing, I’d simply say that any global solution offered to us in the coming years is, in fact, a globalist solution. If you do not get together with your neighbors to start exercising self-sufficiency and control over your life, you will fall into globalist dependency and control by default. And if you do not get together with those in your local community to devise a currency (or other method of trade/barter) of your own, you will end up using bankster currency by default. Power that is not taken into your own hands is left to the predators who grasp for it.

    [Update 1 – 11 November 2014]

    In response to this comment from a suspected webtroll…

    “How do you know that Putin isn’t telling Kissinger, ‘Buddy, your days are numbered.’”

    …I looked up an old New York Times article I ran across a while ago…

    So while the front page news has blaring headlines about the supposed conflict between West and East, you’ll find the truth a little deeper in the paper: that all these political types work for the same bosses and are actually buddies behind the scenes. Don’t be distracted by the public puppet theater.

    Love always…



  6. RonMamita says:

    G20 Brisbane – The Asia-Pacific Perspective

    Video: http://www.corbettreport.com/mp4/app20141113.mp4

    Welcome back to The Asia-Pacific Perspective, that monthly show where James Corbett of corbettreport.com and Broc West of apperspective.net break down all the latest news and headlines from the Asia-Pacific region. In this month’s conversation:

    STORY 1:
    G20: The Bizarre Items Banned From Brisbane CBD
    Entire Hospital Wing Allocated For G20 Overlords
    Queensland Police to Use Surveillance Drones to “Combat Crime” Ahead of G20 Conference
    #FalseFlag Watch: Australian Intelligence Officials Fear Hacker Attacks During G20 Summit
    Brisbane Lockdown Sees Exodus as Police Outnumber G-20 Delegates

    STORY 2:
    G20 Coverage & Updates: Peoples’ Summit in Brisbane | TOTT News
    Agent Provocateurs Caught Disguised As Protestors At G20 Pittsburgh
    Police Provocateurs at Montebello SPP Summit
    Press For Truth: Into The Fire (Full Film)


  7. RonMamita says:

    Remember I shared my dream about Putin’s rescue, even though I think he is untrustworthy too?
    My sense is that Vladimir Putin will be betrayed or double-crossed by another member nation of the BRICS

    Below is a interesting quote and observation:

    The coordination between the central banks of the world is necessary in order for any adjustments and restructuring of mandates and framework policies to be effectively implemented. Within the BIS organization is a working group called the Committee on the Global Financial System, which is mandated with designing and implementing these adjustments and building transparency between the banks themselves, and between the banks and other global institutions, such as the IMF.

    This committee is made of the more important central banks and the focus is on global liquidity, joint money and credit policies, and financial stability. The member banks are:

    Reserve Bank of Australia Bank of Korea
    National Bank of Belgium Central Bank of Luxembourg
    Central Bank of Brazil Bank of Mexico
    Bank of Canada Netherlands Bank
    People’s Bank of China Monetary Authority of Singapore
    European Central Bank Bank of Spain
    Bank of France Sveriges Riksbank
    Deutsche Bundesbank Swiss National Bank
    Hong Kong Monetary Authority Bank of England
    Reserve Bank of India Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
    Bank of Italy Federal Reserve Bank of New York
    Bank of Japan

    The astute reader will notice that Russia is not included in the list, which likely has a lot to do with the recent demonization of Russia in the western media and the attempts by Russia to be included into the broader multilateral reforms. We could potentially see a situation down the road where China turns its back on Russia and the BRICS alliance is fragmented, but at that point the multilateral financial system will be in play, which in such a case would suggest that China manipulated the BRICS development to its own advantage. – http://philosophyofmetrics.com/2014/12/10/the-globalization-of-central-banks/


Please Contribute a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 395 other followers

The Worldwide Awakening
Peaceful Awareness & Knowledge Based TransitionSeptember 11, 2017
Exercise freedom and creativity for all Earth’s inhabitants to explore ready breakthroughs in Self Organizing Communities, economics, and technology. This is a D.I.Y. project
State Sponsored Terror
The Big Day ReportMarch 30, 2018
Institutions of crime Big days have come, gone, and come again (Manipulations: Market Exchanges crash, wars, government Elections, and Taxation). Search for what is hidden and for what is not spoken. What secrets are hidden in Antarctica? Be Aware of the next big Day for fraudulent institutions.
Peace Today

Peace Today

RonMamita’s Blog
November 2014
All posts here
Audio coming soon!
%d bloggers like this: